Gujarat High Court High Court

Vikas vs Union on 6 September, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Vikas vs Union on 6 September, 2011
Author: V. M. Jhaveri,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/11855/2004	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 11855 of 2004
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI  
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
 
 
=========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================


 

VIKAS
H. SINGH S/O LATE H.N.SINGH - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

UNION
OF INDIA & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
MS TRIVEDI and MR RAJENDRA M DESAI for the Petitioner. 
MS PAURAMI
B SHETH for the
Respondents. 
========================================= 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 06/09/2011 

 

 
 
					ORAL
JUDGMENT

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI)

1. By
way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the judgment of
the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad dated 23.3.2004 in
O.A.No. 521 of 2003.

2. The
Original Application preferred by the petitioner was rejected. While
considering the case, the Tribunal in paragraph 9.6 has observed as
under:

“6. In the
present case, the order impugned has been passed by the Prasar
Bharati and the respondents are also officers of the Prasar Bharati
including Union of India which has been made party through Director
General, All India Radio, Prasar Bharati Corporation. Thus, the
department of Information and Broadcasting Corporation, Government of
India has not been made a party.”

Further,
in paragraph 4.3 of the affidavit-in-reply, it has been categorically
stated that the case of petitioner was considered thrice. In spite of
that, he was not found eligible.

3. For
the aforesaid reason, this petition is devoid of merits and is
accordingly dismissed.

(V.M.SAHAI,J)

(K.S.JHAVERI,J)

***vcdarji

   

Top