High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Vikash Chandra Mishra vs The State Of Bihar & Ors. on 29 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Vikash Chandra Mishra vs The State Of Bihar & Ors. on 29 September, 2011
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1608 of 2011
                   VIKASH CHANDRA MISHRA, SON OF LATE NARAYAN MISHRA, RESIDENT
                   OF MOHALLA POLICE LINE MUNGER, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT MUNGER.
                                          Versus
                   1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                   2. S.K. NEGI, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE
                      PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COOPOERATION, NEW
                      SECRETARIAT, BIHAR, PATNA.
                   3. SURESH PRASAD SINGH, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
                      PETITIONER, THE REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NEW
                      SERETARIAT, BIHAR, PATNA.
                   4. CHAKRADHAR JHA, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
                      PETITIONER, THE JOINT REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETY,
                      BHAGALPUR.
                   5. THE MUNGER-JAMUI CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,
                      MUNGER THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NAMELY MANOJ
                      KUMAR SHARMA, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER.
                   6. SHAILENDRA KUMAR, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
                      PETITIONER, THE CHAIRMAN, THE MUNGER-JAMUI CENTRAL
                      COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, MUNGER.
                   7. MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
                      PETITIONER, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE MUNGER-JAMUI
                      CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, MUNGER.
                                      ----------------------------------

03. 29.09.2011 By filing show cause opposite parties have

informed this Court that against the order dated

16.11.2010, Annexure-1, alleging non-compliance

whereof this contempt petition has been filed, L.P.A.

No.312 of 2011 has been filed, in which notices were

issued.

Let petitioner appear in the aforesaid

L.P.A. and as and when order of the High Court

becomes final, approach this Court again by filing

another contempt petition annexing the order

dismissing the aforesaid L.P.A.

Contempt petition stands disposed of.

      Rajesh/                                 ( V. N. Sinha, J.)