Gujarat High Court Case Information System
Print
CR.MA/14156/2010 2/ 2 ORDER
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 14156 of 2010
In
CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1933 of 2010
=========================================================
VINAY
BHAGWANDAS - Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE
OF GUJARAT & 9 - Respondent(s)
=========================================================
Appearance
:
MS
DIPTI PANDYA for MS KRUTI M SHAH for Applicant(s) : 1,
MR JK SHAH,
APP for Respondent(s) : 1,
RULE SERVED BY DS for Respondent(s) : 2
- 5,7 - 10.
UNSERVED-EXPIRED (R) for Respondent(s) :
6,
=========================================================
CORAM
:
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
and
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE P.P.BHATT
Date
: 17/03/2011
ORAL
ORDER
(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)
1. The present
application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 19 days.
Rule was issue on
25.02.2011 returnable today, i.e. 17.03.2011.
2. Learned Advocate
Ms.Dipti Pandya for learned Advocate Ms.Kruti M.Shah for the
applicant states that Rule is served to all the respondents, except
respondent No.6, who is reported to have expired.
2.1 Learned Advocate
for the applicant requests that she be permitted to delete respondent
No.6.
Permission is granted.
3. Though served, none
of the private respondents have chosen to appear in the matter.
Learned APP Mr.Shah appears for respondent No.1-State.
4. Heard learned
Advocate for the applicant and learned APP Mr.Shah for respondent
No.1-State.
5. Having heard the
learned Advocate for the applicant, the application is allowed.
Delay is condoned. Rule is made absolute.
(Ravi
R.Tripathi, J.)
(P.P.Bhatt,
J.)
*Shitole
Top