High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Vinod Mistri & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Vinod Mistri & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2011
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Criminal Miscellaneous No.26338 of 2011
                   1.    Vinod Mistri, son of Ganauri Mistri
                   2.    Gauri Devi, wife of Binod Mistri
                   Both resident of village - Pawai, P.S. - Maskaur, District -
                   Nawada.
                                                                  ------ Petitioners.
                                               Versus
                   The State of Bihar                     ----Opposite Party
                                               ******

02. 30.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in

connection with Sirdala (Maskaur) P.S. Case No.

94/2010, pending in the court of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Nawada, are named accused in this case.

Submission is that under similarly situated

circumstances some of the co-accused have already

been granted privilege by Benches of this Court vide

order dated 08.04.2011 and 01.04.2011 passed in Cr.

Misc. No. 43324/2010 and Cr. Misc. No. 6920/2011

respectively.

Considering the facts and circumstances of

the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within

a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners

be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of
Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties

of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with

Sirdala (Maskaur) P.S. Case No. 94/2010, subject to

condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court

regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the

case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on

two consecutive dates, without any reasonable

explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to

be cancelled.

Rajeev/                        ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)