High Court Kerala High Court

Vinod vs State Of Kerala & Others on 4 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
Vinod vs State Of Kerala & Others on 4 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 4038 of 2010()



1. VINOD
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA & OTHERS
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN

                For Respondent  :SMT.P.G.BABITHA

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :04/10/2010

 O R D E R
           M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.

            ---------------------------------------------
             CRL.M.C.NO.4038 OF 2010
            ---------------------------------------------
             Dated        4th    October, 2010


                           O R D E R

Petitioner is the husband and third

respondent, the wife. They are respectively

accused and de facto complainant in

C.C.969/2009 on the file of Judicial First

Class Magistrate’s Court-III, Palakkad

taken cognizance for the offence under

Section 498 A of Indian Penal Code on

Annexure-II final report submitted by Sub

Inspector of Police, Mankara Police Station.

Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code

of Criminal Procedure to quash the

proceedings contending that entire

matrimonial disputes were settled amicably

and they are now living cordially together

and it is not in the interest of justice to

Crmc 4038/10
2

continue the prosecution.

2. Third respondent appeared

through a counsel and filed a joint petition

with the petitioner stating that entire

matrimonial disputes were settled amicably and

she is living with the petitioner and

therefore, it is not in the interest of justice

to continue the prosecution.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner, third respondent and learned

Public Prosecutor were heard.

4. Joint statement filed by the

petitioner and third respondent establishes

that entire matrimonial disputes were settled

amicably between the husband and wife and they

are now living together under one roof. As

held by the Apex Court in B.S.Joshi and others

v. State of Haryana and another (2003(4) SCC

Crmc 4038/10
3

675), when matrimonial disputes were settled,

it is not in the interest of justice to stand

on technicalities and continue the prosecution.

Petition is allowed. C.C.969/2009 on the

file of Judicial First Class Magistrate’s

Court-III, Palakkad is quashed.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,
JUDGE.

uj.