Vinodini Amma vs Cherthala Municipality on 29 June, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 15654 of 2009(B)


1. VINODINI AMMA, AGED 68 YEARS
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY
                       ...       Respondent

2. SIDHARTHAN

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.PRAMOD

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :29/06/2009

 O R D E R
               THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J
                   ...........................................
                   WP(C).NO. 15654              OF 2009
                  ............................................
          DATED THIS THE           29th DAY OF JUNE, 2009

                                JUDGMENT

According to the petitioner, the proceedings before the

learned Ombudsman for Local Self Government institutions as

initiated by the second respondent is essentially victimization in

as much as parties stand concluded by the earlier proceedings

before the Ombudsman itself. It is not for this court to assume

that a high repository of power would not hear the petitioner. It

is not proper to interfere with such proceedings in a pre-emtive

or an anticipatory mode, particularly when, if the petitioner is

aggrieved by any order that the Ombudsman issues, affecting the

petitioner’s right, she would be entitled to seek redressal against

that. Hence, leaving open all questions, this writ petition is

dismissed without prejudice.

THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN,
JUDGE

lgk/29/6