High Court Kerala High Court

Vipun Vijay vs The Tahsildar on 23 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
Vipun Vijay vs The Tahsildar on 23 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 21917 of 2008(H)


1. VIPUN VIJAY, S/O.VIJAYAN.H, LATHALAYAM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE TAHSILDAR, VYTHIRI TALUK,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VELLARIMALA VILLAGE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :23/07/2008

 O R D E R
                            S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
                    ==================
                      W.P.(C).No.21917 of 2008
                    ==================
               Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2008
                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner’s forefathers migrated from Karnataka State

and settled down at Vellarimala in Wynad District. Their caste at

Karnataka was known as “Poojari” The petitioner’s mother is a

native of Kerala belonging to “Thiyya” caste. In the SSLC book of

the petitioner, no caste is shown. Now the petitioner has been

directed to produce a caste certificate for joining the military

service. However, the application for community certificate filed

before the 1st respondent was rejected on the ground that since

there is no caste by name, “Hindu-Poojari” among the list of

communities of Kerala State, no such certificate can be issued.

The petitioner, therefore, seeks the following reliefs:

“(a) issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or
direction calling for the records of the case and to quash the
original of Ext.P6.

(b) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or
direction to the respondents directing them to issue a certificate
indicating his caste status.”

2. Perhaps for the purpose of employment in the State of

Kerala, the petitioner may not be eligible for a caste certificate

w.p.c.21917/08 2

showing the caste as “Hindu-Poojari”. But when an authority

insists that the petitioner should produce a caste certificate for

the purpose of getting employment, the petitioner cannot be

without any remedy, in view of the peculiar circumstances he is

in. Therefore, I am of opinion that the respondents should

conduct necessary enquiries in the matter and give a certificate

showing the present caste status of the petitioner. If the

respondents are satisfied that the petitioner’s forefathers are

belonging to the caste of “Hindu-Poojari” in Karnataka, and his

father is also of that caste, since the father’s caste follows son,

the 1st respondent shall issue a caste certificate showing that the

petitioner’s caste is “Hindu-Poojari” of Karnataka State. This shall

be done within three weeks from the date of receipt of a certified

copy of this judgment. If a certified copy of this judgment is

produced before the authority before whom the petitioner has to

produce the caste certificate, that authority shall give the

petitioner one month’s time to produce the caste certificate.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

sdk+                                         S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
             ///True copy///


                             P.A. to Judge

w.p.c.21917/08    3