High Court Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Virendra Yadav vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 20 October, 2010

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Virendra Yadav vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 20 October, 2010
                                                                     Item No. 44, DJ/-
                                                             SBCWP NO. 9609/2010
                                               Virandra Yadav Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.
                                                          Order dt: 20th October, 2010


                                    1/2


     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                             AT JODHPUR
                               ORDER

S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9609/2010
Virandra Yadav Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.

DATE OF ORDER :::         20th October, 2010

                             PRESENT


             HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI


Mr. P. Nayak, for the petitioner.
                                    ---

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court against his

transfer from Government Upper Primary School, Sarade Bhilan,

Panchayat Samiti Bagidora to Government Upper Primary School,

Dungerbhit Ghati, Panchayat Samiti Kushalgarh vide order Annex-1

dated 26.09.2010. Against the impugned transfer order, the petitioner

has already submitted a representation on 30.09.2010 (Annex-2),

however, the representation filed by the petitioner has not been

decided till today.

3. Considering the submissions made at the bar, it is

considered expedient to direct the respondent- competent authority to

decide the representation filed by the petitioner by speaking order

dealing with the relevant facts and circumstances of the case and
Item No. 44, DJ/-

SBCWP NO. 9609/2010
Virandra Yadav Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.

Order dt: 20th October, 2010

2/2
determine all the points raised by the petitioner separately within a

period of four weeks from today. It is only after such speaking order is

passed and the same is adverse to the petitioner that the petitioner is

free to avail his legal remedy.

4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. A copy of this

order be sent to the respondents forthwith.

(DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J.

DJ/-

44