IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.20113 of 2010
VISHWANATH PANJIYAR @ VISHWAJIT KUMAR @ BISHU
SON OF JAYNANDAN PANJIYAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
MOKWA, P.S. ASARGANJ, DISTRICT MUNGER.
--- PETITIONER.
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR--- OPP. PARTY.
with
Cr.Misc. No.20222 of 2010
MITHELESH SINGH @ MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH SON
OF LATE SACHCHIDA NAND SINGH, RESIDENT OF
VILLAGE MUKHTIYARPUR, P.S. MAHNAR, DISTT.
VAISHALI. --- PETITIONER.
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR--OPP. PARTY .
-----------
For the petitioner in Cr.Misc. No. 20113 of 2010 : Mrs.
Mira Kumari, Adv.
For the State : Mr. A.A. Khan, A.P.P.
For the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No.20222 of 2010:
Mr. Vijay Anand,Adv.
For the State : Mr. R.P.Singh, A.P.P.
—
2/ 14.06.2010 Heard the parties.
In a criminal prosecution for offence under
section 379 of the Indian Penal Code the petitioners are
not named in the F.I.R. as accused. The F.I.R., Annexure-
1, was lodged with respect to the theft of a motorcycle.
It is submitted that four motorcycles were seized
from near Kuber Hotel, Exhibition Road, Patna and for that
Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 364 of 2009 was registered
and there the petitioners were named as accused.
Thereafter on mere suspicion in several other identical
cases, including present one, the petitioners have been
remanded as accused. Petitioner Vishwanath Panjiyar @
-2-
Vishwajit Kumar @ Bishu is said to be in judicial custody
since 06.11.2009 and petitioner Mithelesh Singh @
Mithilesh Kumar Singh is said to be in judicial custody
since 10.11.2009.
Be that as it may, in the facts and
circumstances let the above named petitioners of both
cases be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to
the satisfaction of Mr. Rajiv Kumar, J.M. Ist Class, Patna
in Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 346 of 2009 subject to the
conditions :
(A) one of the bailors must be government
servant or close family members of the
petitioners, who will file an affidavit in the
court below showing his/her relationship
with the petitioners,
(B) if the petitioners are found involved in
same and similar nature of cases in
future, then in that case the informant/
prosecution shall be at liberty to file a
petition for cancellation of the bail of the
petitioners, and if such a petition is filed,
the court below would be obliged to
dispose of the same in accordance with
law after giving opportunity of hearing to
-3-
all concerned and
(C) the petitioners shall make regular pairvi in
the court below in the present case either
by appearing themselves in person or
through representation by their lawyer on
each and every dates, and if on two
consecutive dates petitioners fail to make
pairvi, then the court below shall be at
liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the
petitioners.
( Birendra Prasad Verma, J )
BTiwary/