Vishwanath Sabarad vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 February, 2010

L.)
z

BANG Alf) R192

4 '1'I~1I.«: (_'.'.ORPSEv2 01> l)IZ'l'1*1(i?'l"l\/E
[C 0 l)3}'-'A1,ACE ROAD

1\;.5;x:\2(;(:x1.(};'2_1:~ 1. . ... Rf'3S§'3()§\El,)~E1\}'_1'S._ ' ~  ' V' "

{By Sri N.I13.V'lSHWANA'I'l~l, E\(I}r'\ ['*"Ol{ H-1. 3  «ii AND
SRL N.B.l--"'A'!'1l.. A1)\/'C)CA'I'E FOR RM2 3

TI--118 \-VRl'l' P[1",'l'l'I'l0N [S FILED UNIBER .1-xR1'1«:Ti1-1«";T;aa. 



ma CONS'l'l'l_'{_3"l'lON OE? 1N1")1A 13RAYl:\E(3 TO Q Lmsz-_-1' z\1\ENHX_--{E'E'{'E'2--§\3 l$";.'I"§'--{I3 < V
FIR 1'zrs:c31s'1'r«;RE.1") IN CRJMIE NO. 92,/'-'2.._GO6 mf. 'é';.3.oc;"1:3ta.::roRE QTHE _ *

ULSOOR ('}A'1'[? 901,105 s"'m'1'1;\2. IaA:._\V1CsA_1,c>r<:~:' E?_()i:{  '1'1-{E"'.cu'14*':=:::€CEs
PUNISHABLE UNDER SEC. 465. 4635;. 4fF!._. 209. 5112013 REA?) Wl'1'l-«E
sac. 34 01? 11%;, NOW 'r;;11«: 1NvVE.$'1'*;»NGAj1_'1<)N 1~:~3___w1'1f;11 (10.13.

RESPONDENT N().4_

This Writ. I”etiti01’1 (:01′:’1;’:_n’

g (’11?$()1*__lieé1;fii’1g5§ iihis day. the
Court: 1:12-xcle the fo110wi11g _ V ‘ ” ” ”

Cafizzd ‘[\\-‘iC€ :_d uriu 1.f’*}£,’:'”€’t,(3{.13jS§€7~ _§5f~-i,1’1’e -day.

W1’i1,_pe1.i1′:i6w is t.1f;¢:1*ét’t)1’é’dismissed for n011–pros<-3cL1ii0n.

Se}/-

EEEDGE %