High Court Karnataka High Court

Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 22 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Vishwanath vs State Of Karnataka on 22 July, 2008
Author: N.Ananda
EN THE HIGH coum or-' KARNATAKA 

CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA   "

DATED THIS THE 221413 DAY 01:' July ' 

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR7 Jus'fIci::_1~é ANAQJA = " 

011.11': No.1$;..'3J.b/20C8«..V=. 'g  
Between:  , "

1. Vishwanath,   ;
S/o.]at;: Siddram,  ' .
Aged abo;1_t3I ygzars,  '

 WI s1"a't+: Sici'drazn,"~A %  . ;
Fwd ah°ml53 m~s- Q

3. 
A. -- .. W] o.V3.nka'£'asWamy,
»  Aged ahfitltt. 

»  2 

Agi;-':_d__ aigbut 4 1 years.

 eflear Vidyabharati

' V ScI:1(x§I,A ':.Raichur. .. Petitioners

% if  P 3 Mali Patil, Adv.)



' 1. State of Karnataka by

West Police Station, xeprcaented by'
Learned State Pubiic Prosecutor,
Bangalore.



2. Poomiztna,

W] avishwanath,

Aged about 26 years,   

R/o.H No.2~96, 233 Block, I

RampnrVi1lagc,     " _ .  

'I'q 85 dist:Raichur. T.   .. Réisspondeiitévn 
(By Sri Sharanabasappa K  HCGF'nfrJr R1)

This criminal petition fl]cd"u1;zdér..Section'482 of Cr.PC,
praying to quash the enztlxief  Crime No.4] 2008
registered by the respondcxitfsn  of JMFC H at

Raichur.

This 'In :3   an 1231: admission this
day, the C3nu:_t--.mafi.';;_ thnjj--f9i1+3§scé:ing%;V  '

,v~«nfink3;«"npndR9ER} --------
 'v'I_'h'e:é'enI{jng to quash FIR mgistered in
Crime  ofiencc punishable under Sccfion

4935' II~'€3.

»A    Counsel for petitioners would submit that

 ~.s}i;1ce  2002 respondent No.2 has been Irvin" " g

petitioner No.1. The 1′” petitioner caused a

legal nnnce to respondent No.2 to come and join him. The

mspondeni: did not join 1*’ petitioner. The 21″‘

~ fnespozlcfsizt has been living with her parents at
WU . –

. V. ‘lfivésffigafing 0fii§§éifl

The 212:3 respcmdcnt had filcd a suit in

against petitioners for decree -of _irVij’z:.§i1.’1’£ ‘ j

x\esa”a1mn’ ‘ g petitioner No.1 fiom Qéecon

a girl and the same was disfizifisgd oh”

3. The petition is filed té’-g’u.a§h the A_ igxfozmatiozu

report. At this stage,’ “mat avfirfiacnts of the
complaint are faise. It_i§’T3:::_o_t that complaint

is frivolous €xIi£i’*}fé.xatfious, “=the:’Investigating Oficer

to ctvwnsidcxrn t.h.e__ .TIt;:crefore, criminal petition is
dismissed’ _H6wévéé r, investigation, petitioners are at

}1’be;r1y _ to fhcwafotestatcd documents before the

Sd/-

Judge

Elm. ~ L

maxwiage. fish