High Court Kerala High Court

Viswanatha Pillai vs State Of Kerala on 8 April, 2010

Kerala High Court
Viswanatha Pillai vs State Of Kerala on 8 April, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 1231 of 2010()


1. VISWANATHA PILLAI, S/O. THANKAPPAN
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SREEKUMAR,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. SOBHANA DEVI, D/O. BHAVANIAMMA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.  K.SHAJ

                For Respondent  :SRI.SYAM J SAM

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :08/04/2010

 O R D E R
            M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.
          ===========================
          CRL.M.C.No. 1231   OF 2010
          ===========================

     Dated this the 8th day of April,2010

                     ORDER

Petitioners are accused 1 and 4 in

C.C.795/2001 on the file of Judicial First

Class Magistrate’s Court, Adoor. As they were

absconding accused 2 and 3 were tried and

acquitted. This petition is filed under

section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

contending that the entire matrimonial disputes

were settled amicably and consequent to the

settlement, it is not in the interest of

justice to continue the prosecution.

2. Second respondent the de facto

complainant appeared through a counsel and

filed an affidavit stating that the entire

matrimonial disputes were settled amicably and

she is now living with the first petitioner

husband and in such circumstances the case is

Crl.M.C.1231/2010 2

to be quashed.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the

petitioners, second respondent and learned Public

Prosecutor were heard.

4. Annexure A1 shows that the very case was

registered on a complaint filed by the second

respondent alleging that first petitioner husband

and the three other accused in-laws committed an

offence under section 498A of Indian Penal Code.

The affidavit filed by the second respondent

establishes that she has settled all matrimonial

disputes and is now residing with her husband. As

held by the Apex Court in B.S. Joshi v. State of

Haryana (2003) 4 SCC 675) when matrimonial disputes

were settled amicably, it is not in the interest of

justice to continue the prosecution standing on

technicalities.

Petition is allowed. L.P.20/2005 in

C.C.795/2001 on the file of Judicial First Class

Magistrate’s Court, Adoor is quashed.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE
tpl/-

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.

———————

W.P.(C).NO. /06

———————

JUDGMENT

SEPTEMBER,2006