High Court Kerala High Court

Viswanathan vs The Secretary on 25 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
Viswanathan vs The Secretary on 25 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 36911 of 2009(H)


1. VISWANATHAN, 14/61, THIRUTHIYIL HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SECRETARY, THE REGIONAL
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.O.D.SIVADAS

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :25/01/2010

 O R D E R
                   P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
             ..............................................................................
                      W.P.(C) No. 36911 OF 2009
              .........................................................................
                     Dated this the 25th January, 2010



                                   J U D G M E N T

The case of the petitioner is that the respondents are much

after the petitioner, seeking to realize arrears of tax in respect of

the vehicle KL. 10/A-8482, invoking the machinery under the

Revenue Recovery Act as borne by Ext.P1. According to the

petitioner, he is not the owner of the vehicle bearing No.KL.

10/A-8482 and that the proceedings pursued by the respondents

are not correct or sustainable, either on facts or in law.

2. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the

respondents, on instruction, submits that the actual number of

the vehicle owned by the petitioner was ‘KL/10A -7884’ and not

KL 10/A- 8482. It is stated, because of an inadvertent mistake,

the actual number of the vehicle happened to be shown as KL.

10/A-8482 in the requisition sent to the revenue authorities and

the said mistake was perpetuated by the revenue authorities as

W.P.(C) No. 36911 OF 2009

2

well, as evident from Ext.P1, referring to the vehicle as KL-

10A/-8482. It is also submitted by the learned Government

Pleader that appropriate steps have already been taken to

correct the number of the vehicle and to proceed with further

steps.

3. In the above facts and circumstances, the respondents

are not justified in proceeding against the petitioner on the basis

of Ext. P1 notice referring to the vehicle bearing No.KL-10/A-

8482. As such, Ext.P1 is set aside, however without prejudice to

the right of the respondents to proceed with appropriate steps

on the basis of proper requisition to be obtained from the

requisitioning authorities and after issuing proper notice as

contemplated under the relevant provisions of the law .

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,
JUDGE.

lk