Gujarat High Court High Court

====================================== vs Mr Aj Desai on 6 September, 2011

Gujarat High Court
====================================== vs Mr Aj Desai on 6 September, 2011
Author: Jayant Patel,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/14099/2005	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 14099 of 2005
 

with
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION NO.7307 OF 2005
 

 
======================================
 

PANKAJ
CO-OP.HOUSING SOCI.LTD.THR' ITS PRESIDENT 

 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUAJRAT THR' CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS
 

====================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR SP MAJMUDAR for the
petitioner 
MR AJ Desai, Assistant Government Pleader for
Respondent No.1  
MR PRANAV G DESAI for Respondent Nos. 2 - 3. 
MR
BS PATEL for Respondent No.4 
======================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
		
	

 

Date
: 28/02/2006 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

Upon
hearing Mr Dave for the applicant in Civil Application and for
respondent No.4 in the main Special Civil Application it, prima
facie, appears that without no objection of the society the property
is purchased. The purchaser is not made as the member of the
Society. It is an admitted position that it is a housing cooperative
society and the permission of the Society is required when the
construction is for commercial use.

Mr
Dave, learned counsel for the contesting respondent submitted that
his client is desirous to make the construction for his personal use
and not for commercial use. Prima facie, such contention cannot be
accepted on the face of the permission granted by the Corporation
which provides for parking place, showroom, plus mezzanine floor,
showroom, plus showroom and one flat. When the applicant of Civil
Application has not acquired the lawful title of the property, the
permission ought not to have been granted by the Corporation.

In
view of the above, as the petition is already admitted, the
ad-interim relief granted earlier shall continue as the interim
relief. It is clarified that the pendency of this petition shall not
operate as a bar to either side for pursuing of the proceedings
before the learned Nominee and/or before the Gujarat State
Cooperative Tribunal including for the interim relief. In the event
the interim relief is not granted or granted in favour of either
side, it would be open for either side to move this Court for
modification and/or vacation of the interim relief.

Civil
Application stands disposed of accordingly.

(Jayant
Patel, J.)
*mohd

   

Top