Gujarat High Court High Court

========================================= vs Mr Janak Raval on 23 November, 2010

Gujarat High Court
========================================= vs Mr Janak Raval on 23 November, 2010
Author: D.H.Waghela,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice J.C.Upadhyaya,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

LPA/2497/2010	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 2497 of 2010
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9671 of 2008
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 12870 of 2010
 

In


 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 2497 of 2010
 

=========================================
 

N.N.
DODIA 

 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT 

 

========================================= 
Appearance
: 
MR HEMANT S SHAH for
Appellant. 
MR JANAK RAVAL, AGP for
Respondent. 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA
		
	

 

Date
: 23/11/2010 

 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)

The
appellant having been dismissed after a regular departmental enquiry
and having been found guilty of serious misconduct thereat,
approached this Court by way of a petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution, wherein learned Single Judge has found even the
punishment to be not disproportionate. Therefore, preferring present
appeal, it is sought to be reiterated on behalf of the appellant that
the appellant having been a doctor in service for no less than
thirteen years, a lenient view could have and ought to have been
taken so as to afford him an opportunity of at least claiming his
terminal benefits or retiral dues. Such argument cannot be accepted
in view of the fact that the appellant has been held guilty of a
serious charge of corruption. Therefore, the appeal as well as the
Civil Application are dismissed in limine.

(D.H.Waghela,
J.) (J.C.Upadhyaya,
J.)

*malek

   

Top