Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print LPA/1933/2009 2/ 2 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 1933 of 2009 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6315 of 2008 With CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10535 of 2009 In LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 1933 of 2009 ====================================== NAVENDUKUMAR HARSHADBHAI BRAHMBHATT Versus STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS ====================================== Appearance : MR BS BRAHMBHATT for Appellant. MS MXOA THAKKAR, AGP for Respondent No.1. None for Respondent Nos.2 - 3. ====================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MD SHAH Date : 07/05/2010 ORAL ORDER
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA)
counsel for the appellant could not challenge the conclusion recorded
by learned Single Judge in the impugned order to the effect that the
appellant was appointed by his father, who was Chairman of the
employer-Market Committee, and no procedure, as prescribed in the
Rules, had been followed in appointment and continuation of the
appellant in service. Grievance of the appellant before learned
Single Judge and before this Court was that the principles of natural
justice were violated in discharging him from service. Therefore, a
specific query was made as regards prejudice, if any, caused to the
appellant, in view of the glaring and admitted facts of the case.
The appellant having failed to show any grievance and the case being
one of stark nepotism in employment in a public institution, the
appeal is not required to be entertained, and hence, it is summarily
dismissed along with Civil Application.