*** vs State Of Haryana & Another on 24 March, 2009

                   C.W. P. No. 6194 of 1989

                                 ***

Surata Ram                                                      ...Petitioner

                                 Versus

State of Haryana & another                                   ...Respondents

                                 ***

Present :    Mr. J. S. Manipur, Advocate
             for the petitioner.

Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

***

In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged his

termination of his services and sought reinstatement and consequent

regularization.

Today, learned counsel for the petitioner has told me that in

fact after the impugned order of termination, the petitioner was reappointed

in the year 1992 and he prays that this writ petition to that extent has been

rendered infructuous and may be dismissed as such while giving

opportunity to seek regularization in view of his subsequent appointment by

filing a representation, in case required.

Ordered accordingly.

Dismissed as having become infructuous.

March 24, 2009                                    ( AJAY TEWARI )
ashish                                                 JUDGE