High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Wakil Ahmad &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 26 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Wakil Ahmad &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 26 August, 2010
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Cr. Misc. No.2839 of 2010
            1.   WAKIL AHMAD,
            2.   Amir Ahmad @ Munshi Ahmad, Both sons of Late Sharif Ahmad @ Suku,
                 Resident of village-Gontiya Chauraha, Richha Post and P.S. Richha, Dist.-
                 Bareli (UP).
            3.   Maksud Ahmad S/o Late Sharif Ahmad @ Suku, resident of Mohalla- Laien
                 No.8, P.S. Haldani, Nainital (Uttrakhand), Richha, Niwasi Rice Saler.
            4.   Babu @ Baid Jabar S/o Late Abdul Gaffar @ Baid Gaffar, Resident of village-
                 Gontiya Chauraha, P.S. and P.O. Richha, Dist- Bareli (UP)
                                                                                  ....Petitioners

                                             Versus

            1.   THE STATE OF BIHAR &
            2.   Krishna Prasad s/o Late Khaderan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Alamganj,
                 Sasaram, P.S. Sasaram, District-Rohtas                ...Opposite Parties
                                         -----------

4/ 26.08.2010 Heard the parties.

The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated

18.9.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Sasaram, Rohtas,

in Complaint Case No.1104 of 2009, by which he has taken cognizance

under section 323, 406 and 420 Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioners by bringing the complaint

petition into the notice of the court has demonstrated that there is

absolutely no averment with regard to the petitioner nos. 1 to 3 and,

therefore, no case is made out against them.

The counsel for the opposite party no.2 is also not in a

position to refute the submission.

In view of such, the cognizance order dated 18.9.2009

passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Rohtas at Sasaram, in

Complaint Case No.1104 of 2009, is hereby quashed in so far as it

relates to the petitioner nos. 1 to 3 only.

The application is allowed in part.

     JA/-                                                             (Anjana Prakash, J.)