Gujarat High Court High Court

Windson vs “4. It on 29 March, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Windson vs “4. It on 29 March, 2011
Author: H.K.Rathod,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

MCA/722/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 722 of 2011
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10880 of 2010
 

 
=========================================================

 

WINDSON
ENTERPRISE THRO A K GHINAIYA THRO POA NAG - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

A
M SOLANKI & 4 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
ASHISH M DAGLI for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR ANANAND L SHARMA, AGP for Opponent(s) : 1.
 

=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 29/03/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

Heard
learned advocates appearing on behalf of respective parties.

In
this application, prayer made by applicant to direct opponent No.1 to
decide and finalise claim of applicant as early as possible.

In
this matter, while passing order in Special Civil Application
No.10880 of 2010 on 9th September, 2010 in Para 4, which
is quoted as under, this Court has directed opponent No.1 to consider
representations made by applicant.

“4. It
is directed to the respondent No.1 – Commissioner of Fisheries
to consider a representation dated 03.03.2010 alongwith a
representation made on 17.02.2010 to the Minister, Fisheries and
earlier representation of 22.06.2009
made to the Commissioner of Fisheries and to examine the grievance on
the basis of existing Government policy at the prevailing time and to
pass appropriate reasoned order within 2 (Two) months from the date
of receiving a copy of this order and to immediately communicate the
decision to the petitioner.”

The
grievance of present applicant is that in spite of aforesaid
direction issued by this Court, no decision has been taken by
opponent No.1 till date, therefore, applicant has filed present
application for further direction.

In
light of this background and considering fact that more than six
months have passed and though this Court has directed opponent No.1
to consider representation of applicant on 9th September,
2010, even though opponent No.1 has not taken any decision in the
matter. Therefore, being one more opportunity, it is directed to
opponent No.1 to comply with order passed by this Court on 9th
September, 2010 in Special Civil Application No.10880 of 2010 as
early as possible on or before 31st May, 2011 and
communicate decision to petitioner immediately, failing which, this
Court will take serious view in this matter.

In
view of above observation and direction, present application is
disposed of.

[H.K.

RATHOD, J.]

#Dave

   

Top