Wonderla Holidays Pvt Ltd vs Nil on 16 December, 2009

\V Arw;%  

I

IN THE HIGH COURT 01:' KARNATAKA AT  _

mma THIS THE 167*" DAY OF 9EcE1x4¥3ER,5io09 3 F: " u .k 

BEFORE: n
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTEQE 

COMPANY Am~LxcA1'I(ir:[4% HQ. 975 %fO1=* 
m comww l?I;fTIT1GN--.1§'0."-»1§}1 OI*"'"2Gfl9

BETWEEN:

WONDERLA H%:>.LI'D%AYs.;{ PRIVME 'hijmfrsig:
A COMPANY iNCQF<PQF€AT'ED Up':D.E1?"i'§ri'E:
COMPAN£ES'AC!_I';~».l956,-}1AViNG  '
REGISTERED (}_F'{+'ICE  "  
NO.64S,1B,. Bl'NNA'?:.'§ANGALA 13?-v.?HASE
1NB1R;,'NAGAi2J,%»J.ST E2'TAG«E~.._ _ -
BANGALORE A-.- 3«:<'.f=._ ' .  ~  APPLICANT

(BY M] S.A I<14;~:GVaa"¥=A"'i2fti.€)F THE COMPANIES (COURD RULES, 1959

"PRAYING--TC) CONDONE THE DELAY OF 23 DAYS IN FILING

 IFIEI) COPY OF' THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS
"§¥{}N'E3LS CGURT ALLOWING COMPANY PETITIDN

.'  ICMQOOQ WITH REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, KARNATAKA.

THIS APPLICATION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,

u THIS BAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

J5



ORBER

The Registrar of c:ompan:ie:-2..   V'

stating that he has no object:ioI1 'to   S 

In that View of the matter, of   

the certified copy 0f, 1:.h€  tfié" "Rcgistra;r of
Companies, by the 

The apgglifiaijon   aflyawed.

  '     _%Sd/._
 ....