IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 36449 of 2010(E)
1. XAVIER BIJU ALIAS MUHAMMED SHAFI,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
... Respondent
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
5. JAMEELA, D/O.KANAPARAMBIL KHADER,
For Petitioner :SMT.K.GIRIJA
For Respondent :SMT.SHERLY THOMAS
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI
Dated :21/12/2010
O R D E R
K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.
------------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.36449 of 2010-E
----------------------------------------------
Dated, this the 21st day of December, 2010
J U D G M E N T
K.M.Joseph, J.
The prayers in the writ petition are as follows:
“i) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ,
direction or order directing the respondents 1 to 4 to
afford necessary and adequate police protection to the
life and property of the petitioner and his family.
ii) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ,
direction or order directing respondents 1 to 4 to register
a crime against 5th respondent and her henchmen on the
basis of Exhibits P3 complaint.”
2. Petitioner is the husband of the 5th respondent.
Allegations are made against the 5th respondent whom the
petitioner married and divorced subsequently. The allegation
is of threat.
3. Though served there is no appearance for the
5th respondent. We heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader.
The writ petition is disposed of directing that if the
petitioner complains of any threat to his life from the 5th
WPC 36449/2010 -2-
respondent before the 4th respondent, the 4th respondent will
look into the complaint and if the complaint is found to be
genuine, he shall provide protection to the life of the petitioner
as and when required as against the 5th respondent.
(K.M.JOSEPH)
JUDGE.
(M.C.HARI RANI)
JUDGE.
MS