High Court Kerala High Court

Yajith vs Chief Welfare Fund Inspector on 9 September, 2009

Kerala High Court
Yajith vs Chief Welfare Fund Inspector on 9 September, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 25517 of 2009(H)


1. YAJITH, S/O.YASHPAL, KOTTUKKAL HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. CHIEF WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR, KERALA ABKARI

3. THE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES (M&M)

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.V.JOY

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :09/09/2009

 O R D E R
                             S. Siri Jagan, J.
               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                     W. P (C) No. 25517 of 2009
               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                Dated this, the 9th September, 2009.

                           J U D G M E N T

The petitioner claims to be dependent of a deceased abkari

worker. He submits that as per Ext. P5 Government Order, 25% of

the daily wage employment vacancies in the 3rd respondent-Company

are reserved to be filled up by dependent sons of abkari workers. The

petitioner submitted an application before respondents 1 and 2 for

consideration of his case also for employment as per Ext. P5

Government Order. The petitioner alleges that a list has been

prepared of eligible dependents of abkari workers for such

employment in which the petitioner’s name has been excluded. In the

above circumstances , the petitioner has filed Ext. P8 representation

before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st

respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P8.

2. I have heard the learned standing counsel for respondents 1

and 2 as also the learned standing counsel for the 3rd respondent.

3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this

writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and

pass orders on Ext. P8 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within

one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after

affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner.

Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.

Tds/

[True copy]

P.S to Judge.