High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Yashwant Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 8 December, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Yashwant Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 8 December, 2010
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CWJC No.12525 of 2008
         YASHWANT KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE RAMDEO PRASAD
         SINGH, RESIDENT OF BINDWARA, P.O.- MUNGER, P.S. KASIM
         BAZAR DISTRICT- MUNGER.
                                                  ... PETITIONER.
                                        Versus
             1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER,
                MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPTT. NEW SECRETARIATE,
                PATNA.
             2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST,
                NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA.
             3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUNGER.
             4. THE ASSISTANT MINING OFFICER, MUNGER.
                                                   .. RESPONDENTS.

          For the Petitioner : M/s. Ashok Kumar Singh (Sr. Advocate),
                               Manisa Singh & Rajendra Prasad,
                               Advocate.
          For the Spl.P.P (Mines) : Mr. Vishwamohan Kumar Sinha,
                                    Advocate.
                                            -----------

2. 08.12.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the

Mines Commissioner dated 2.5.2008 passed in Revision

case No. 57 of 2007, Annexure-9, whereunder the request

of the petitioner for giving him a revised bill for payment

of royalty for the period between 10.5.2001 till 14.2.2003

has been refused on the ground that petitioner ought to

have paid the royalty as per the revised rates in Schedule-

II of the Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972. It

is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he was

allowed mining lease for the period of ten years

commencing from 10.5.2001 but the same was
2

determined with effect from 14.2.2003. During the period

when the lease subsisted petitioner paid the royalty but

not as per the revised rate. Accordingly, he requested the

authorities to furnish him a revised demand for payment

of arrears of royalty for the aforesaid period. From the

order impugned it appears that the request has been

refused on the ground that petitioner was aware of the

revised rate at the first instance itself he ought to have

paid the royalty at the revised rate. Petitioner may not

have paid the royalty as per the revised rates but when he

is coming forward to pay the same the authorities should

issue the revised demand for payment of the arrears of

royalty for the period between 10.5.2001 to 14.2.2003.

3. Let the Mines Officer, Munger ensure issue

of the revised demand for the payment of arrears of the

royalty for the period between 10.5.2001 to 14.2.2003, as

early as possible, in any case within one month from the

date of receipt of a copy of this order before the Mines

Officer, Munger and petitioner should also pays the said

amount within another fifteen days of the receipt of the

demand.

4. The writ application is, accordingly,

disposed of.

Ibrar/-                                ( V. N. Sinha, J.)