High Court Karnataka High Court

Yelhanka Merchants Finance Co. vs Srikanth Inamdar S/O Madhava Rao … on 4 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Yelhanka Merchants Finance Co. vs Srikanth Inamdar S/O Madhava Rao … on 4 June, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi
-;_

EN THE HiGH comm' or KARNATAKA A3' 3ANGALORE
DATED T'HiS THE 4TH mo; OF' JUNE 2099 
BEFORE & "  
THE HOBVBLE MRJUSTICE sU8HA'$§{'v:"§é:..A;:;;  V'  
cmnexgggg, ggrrrrogg      "    
BE'f'WEE§\I:     " .. ~  "

Yeihanka Merchants,

Finance Co.

Bypass, B.B.Road,

Yelhanka,

Banga10r€-- 560 064

Rep. by its Manager amt} j'  _   

G.P.A. Holder    '   

'W/o.Garudajg::pa";..__  .'     .. PETITIONER

(BY S1i.l\%;'S'i*ix1if'§93S: :39:  
S11 M. R.'Sh.aahid'h2t-;r,_   -.

AND:

Srikanth IAnaI1iVda1:f V " 

 V. S] 0._!vi}=.1d§a<:a Rat) "iriamxiar,

Aggdicgabdmg --4E§~years

 4, s;:n%ae_m_¢ights,
Asp¢n C3.ar~:E¢ei1,V'?-Eeliazace oflice,

Hesa2~aghai€2g--.R§:ad,
Banggiorg-. . _  ,. RESPONDENT

#k 

  =   T'hi$ Crimina} Petificsn is fileéi unéer Section 482 of C2191).
. p:£ayi;rig to set aside the order datsd: 6.11.2200? passed by the Xli

Adf:11.Chief Metrzzspolitan Magistrate at Bangaiore 113

T  " P.'{:.R.No.8{::3;200é and restore the mmc.

'f'his Pefifion ceming on for admission this day, the Ccaurt
made the follawéng:



'}

...4_..

O R D E R

Petitioner is the ooatzplainant before the learned Magistrate.

He had flied a complaint for an offence pumlshabic un(ie’:>Section
138 of the Nzagotiablo Instruments Act. H .

2. It appears that, there was a ciclay in
in this regaltl, he had flied an a;:§.1’V:>>HV(:»z%:§A1:io.v:1′.”.fo:’A AV
delay. However, petitionor »re_:maiAhu’cAd “«..o.bse’B f.”_A.of1 A
27.3.2007, 10.4.2007. 14,”3;2oo*;-*o 11.29%
Noticing tho lapse on t;?:i’e._;JaI’towAo’f showing no
intérost in pmsccuting Magistrate had no

option excegat to diaslnissigthej h V

“the: petibloner though submits

various gtomnds for__ré1fiaioing absent, bui none of the gjmuncis

< «However, taking into consideration that

"caosr:._V;i'r:gs:fVc'.J$.:%"t:s_ dishonour of cheque Worth of Rs.3,56,39{)/ – in

my o§3iI1io12;."Lj<m §: more chance could be gfalltftd.

"A<:;uc:orfi1ingly, the petition is allowod. The order dated

V' 'Lv.jof5I%1'T1';«;2oo7 passed by the X1; Addi.C,!vi.M., Bangalore in

' f5';§§.'fé.No.8G3/2906 is set aside subject to petitioner fie};-rositixzg

New 01* Rs.5,(}{}()/— before the State Legai Services Authority.

Leaznod Magisflatez is; directed' to take up the matter from the

stage of dismissal of the conm1a:i111:. If the nefifioner makes two

.n-'-

ctmsecuirivc defaults, the Magistmte is at liberty to dismiss thfi

complaint.

 1   I    _

    

KNM/~