1353 THE HEGH COURT' OF' KARNATAKA
CTIRCUYE' BENCH AT G-UL-BARCrA
DATED THIS THE :24rrH my 09 MARCH "
BEFORE V A A
THE HOWBLE: MR..JUs'1*:cE 5;;ééA;$;A*?¥ANA;3§--A§rA§u§' ' _
W.P'.§\§0.850{)QFi2I}1}§§LK) " A' A
BETWEEN: A A A
SRLYENKAPPA §2m)RE'A:.tvIs<§5N.eA;:, 'CA9N'AF'RCA3i,LER,
N.EL{{.f2;'§'.C.
V. _, I§A;;CHE;I'i? DI.VIS10A1\i';""' AA
.RA.IQ§I:jR..% _ ...RE';SPC'iND;¥EiNTS
A' petition is filed under articies 225 and 22'? Of
é the Cafisijtfifinn 0f India, pmying to quash the awaré ciated
A .'3,_20GA6A passed by thfi Labour Court, Gulharga in K31)
2002 Vidfii An11exure~A, by which the Labour Couri
A iA1A;as dsnieé benefits of continuity of service and ha-::kw'ag{~:$ to
" AAAAiA11€ petitioner from the date of illegal termination till the date
of his x*€:2'.n$tatement, since the same is arbitxary, erroneous
and cantraxy to the provisions 0f the E.D.Act and etc.
This wzit petition ceming on for orders
Court made 1121:: fo1k;wing:- 3 " K ' K
O R D E R
This Wlii petition is filed the : cia{€£i{
8.3.2002 passed by the Lfihapr
texzninafinn of the petitioner Sfitiviéé aiso far a
direction for minstatem.c;§rj.t_ ‘€gOflfi1’¥ttity 01″ service and
1:3-thcr . V
2. ‘ ‘*r1«1e’ ra¢ts5A’1s={a;d.;§5;g”‘m this writ gxetitiim is that tbs
petitioner hféffifilv was apTp0i11ted as Comtiuctor under the:
. “‘reVsvp<;11(ié: on 20.10.1993, while he was
as conductor, on 8.1.2000 he went on
d;1§.t;§,§V;Ez"0}32':i§':}ai:;I1u'r to Hubii via Badami and ratumed back
-.fra.:>m }i£i:;_ c§i11t}? on 9,1.2(}0{). It was expecteci of the petitioner’
to remit the entire revanue coklscteé in thér said trip
Q11 his :*€tfa11’1:1. In the iastant case, tlm mvenue coiiected; by
him was Rs.’7,333/- which was required to be ciapositfid by
him in the depot bctfczsre living the premises affm’ Completion
E31,: ?
of his duty far that paxfimziar trip. However,
&i& not éeposit the maney, he went, home K V’
back to aluty till 22.8.2099. 5=£~?:§séM’¢a:.:qe;_ha<§1§' .<;§n1y 'Vg§i«
22.68.2000 on that day de3;rosifc*.vfIv._t:t1$.af0-:§i:_::zaid
giving' explanation for his absenée-.that he xlgeéping '%
good health and that héifiras éf'bi§ck magic
due to which he 'V under the
¢:iz'cumstance§,, « come back snag
may mmit 15¢ duty. Based on this, afi
e:quir§"' and the petitioner
wherein it was proved that
there was tempcmxy cf ftmds by the
petitiongr… '_ In it is aim refsrred that
earlisr Lfiisgéénfluct C3333 against the yetitiener
beigsfigg thei" ._ Based on the 1333011 sf
1:h§ kwas dismiswd frmta service on
H The said GI'étiiI° of éismissal was chaflgngefi by
'::i;éj§¢ti"fi§'fier herein in pzmméags 33 K.:.0.:~ze.1?5/2902, in
t%1e séid pmceedings, hasad on ths }:)}€ading$ {If the
'iv;
5
patitioner and alga tha rfispondant, issues were f1fE1_f}1f_C§Z}aI1(i
the Labour ilfourt confirmed the puzaishmént of”é’is:x1i$s’-3?; eszf
fine petit:io.I:}.t:r from Service. The said Qrckizi. _€i:f _’ L;ahQi1r<_Cr)11::.f,x
13 Chailengetzi herein.
4. Heart} £115 CO1Z1I1SEL§}1″
5.. Tile ortifirfaf thfi pmpezr
mid. does not sufier ‘e-ztgd does not require
to ha iI1ter:fered_in fl1is..xx§fii. * in may event, the
gz1ilt%;>f tiié” iji’«t{%mpo1ré§f}? misappropriation sf flmds
of t§17e ifispea&§{;&?;Cfifpo?afion is pravad beyoné 3}}
;’eas9_11ab1€u”{3.g:$ubt..’- ‘Fh€:é’éf:3re, question of I’€~CO£1Si(i€:1’i11g the
séitiiifi 15:1}. ‘§.vrif”‘j;}5éiition does not arise. Hence, the writ
“;g§t’:i?;i§é’::._«Vis»v €i§.3fi;j.sseci xvimcui any order as to costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE: