Gujarat High Court Case Information System
Print
SCR.A/1936/2010 1/ 1 ORDER
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1936 of 2010
=================================================
YOGESHBHAI
NAROTTAMBHAI PURANI - Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
=================================================
Appearance :
MR
SIKANDER SAIYED for Applicant(s) : 1,
MR KARTIK PANDYA APP for
Respondent(s) : 1,
None for Respondent(s) :
2,
=================================================
CORAM
:
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
Date
: 04/10/2010
ORAL
ORDER
The
challenge in this petition under Article 226 of the constitution of
India is the order dated 22.09.2005 passed by the learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Vadodara by which the petitioner was directed to pay
Rs.1,000/- p.m to the respondent-wife from the date of application
18.08.2001 and also to pay costs of Rs.2,000/-.
Having
heard learned advocate for the petitioner and perusing the record of
the case, the above bare minimum amount awarded to the
respondent-wife as maintenance does not require any interference by
this Court.
Accordingly,
this petition is rejected with costs of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the
respondent-wife over and above the arrears and costs to be deposited
by the petitioner.
[Anant
S. Dave, J.]
*pvv
Top