High Court Jharkhand High Court

Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 9 May, 2011

Jharkhand High Court
Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 9 May, 2011
      IN   THE   HIGH   COURT   OF   JHARKHAND   AT   RANCHI
                    W.P (PIL) No. 1530 of 2009
                          ­­­­­­­
      Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro..... ...      ...     .... Petitioner
                           Versus
      The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ....      ......       Respondents
                          ­­­­­­­
      CORAM:         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. MERATHIA
                          ­­­­­­
      For the Petitioner:          M/s Ajit Kumar
      For the Respondents:     Mr. D.K. Dubey, G.P. I
                          ­­­­­­­­
                                                             th
                                                    Dated 09    May, 2011
                                                                         
                            ­­­­­­­
24/          This   Public   Interest   Litigation   is   going   on   since   2009. 

      Several   orders   have   been   passed   by   this   Court   taking   serious 

      view and on 9th  October, 2009 this Court directed the Director 

      General of Police (Vigilance) to make a thorough enquiry and 

      submit report regarding misappropriation of public fund which 

      was   meant  for   construction  of   schools.  Again   on  5th    October, 

      2010 when the matter was taken up, this Court issued notice of 

      contempt to the Director General of Police (Vigilance) as to why 

      he   should     be   not   punished   for   non   compliance   of   the   order 

      dated 9th  October, 2009. The D.G.P. (vigilance) was directed to 

      appear   before   this   Court   on   6.10.2010   and   on   6.10.2010   the 

      D.G.P. (Vigilance) was not in a position to answer any inquiry of 

      the Court and the matter was adjourned and on 24th November, 

      2010 it was  observed  that this  time  should be  utilized  by  the 

      State   for   putting   its   house   in   order   and   discharging   its 

      obligation. Then on 8th December, 2010 order was passed to file 

      fresh progress report, after taking note of the fact that the F.I.R 

      has already been lodged in the matter of mis­appropriation of 
 public   fund   that   too   with   respect   to   construction   of   schools 

under Sarva Siksha Abhiyan. And on 17th  January, 2011 it was 

reported that only seven out of thirty two accused persons have 

been   arrested   and   it   was   specifically   observed   that   in   case 

remaining accused persons will not be arrested, the Investigating 

Officer will have to face the consequences. Then again on 25th 

January, 2011, this Court observed that substantially, there is no 

progress and on 17th  February, 2011 again it was observed that 

the   Investigating   Officer   has   so   far   not   shown   result 

notwithstanding the  earlier order passed by this Court. On 8th 

March, 2011, it was informed that one of the officers has been 

arrested and rests were not arrested. On 26th  April, 2011, this 

Court   constrained   to   direct     the   Director   General   of   Police, 

Jharkhand to handover the  investigation about the  conduct of 

the   Investigating   Officer   of   this   case   to   a   senior   responsible 

officer of the State to see as to why and how and under what 

circumstances   the   Investigating   Officer,   investigating   this   case, 

has not been able to arrest the remaining  13 accused persons 

and also directed to submit a report in this regard. 

       Today,   a   report   has   been   submitted   by   the   respondent­

State. Annexure­1 of the said report submitted by the Additional 

Director   General   of   Police,   Criminal   Investigating   Department, 

Jharkhand,   wherein,   after   narrating   the   facts   with   respect   to 

charge­sheet   submitted,   it   has   been   stated   about   the   efforts 

which   have   been   made   for   arresting   the   remaining   accused 

persons and it has been stated that process under Section 82 and 

83 Cr.P.C were also initiated against one of the accused namely, 
 Archana Kumari and a schedule has been annexed to show that 

even public notice were issued for the named accused persons 

who   are   accused   in   the   criminal   case   under   Sections 

403/406/409/120

B/467/468/471 /201/109 of the Indian Penal 

Code.

It  appears  that  the  report   has  been    submitted  only to 

justify   the   action   of   the   Investigating   Officer   who   could   not 

arrest   the   13   accused   persons   who   were   said   to   be   the 

Government Servants at a particular point of time. 

According to the learned counsel for the respondents, out 

of 13 accused, services of nine persons have  been terminated, 

who   were   working   on   contract   basis.   However,   four   accused 

persons are in service but they are not traceable.

From the facts referred above, it is apparent that the State 

is yet helpless in arresting the accused persons in spite of the fact 

that it was  the matter relating tot he  construction  of  building 

under   Sarva   Siksha   Abhiyan   and   there   is   clear   case   of 

embezzlement of huge fund in this project, who have not spared 

even the children of the State of Jharkhand.

In view of the above reasons, let a copy of this order be 

sent to the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand as well as 

the Home Secretary, Government of Jharkhand so that they look 

into the affairs which is going on in the State of Jharkhand and 

find   out   as   to   why   these   persons,   who   are   not   the   hardened 

criminals,   could   not   be   arrested   by   the   police   authorities, 

ignoring   the   serious   view   taken   by   this   Court   on   several 

occasions.   We   cannot   appreciate   the   reports   submitted   by   the 
officers who investigated about the conduct of the Investigating 

Officers. The State may file a progress report by 7th June, 2011.

Put up this Case on 7th June, 2011.  

(Prakash Tatia, J)

                                                                                     (R.K. Merathia, J) 

Alankar/­