High Court Karnataka High Court

Zakir Hussain vs State By Kumaraswamy Layout … on 31 August, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Zakir Hussain vs State By Kumaraswamy Layout … on 31 August, 2010
Author: N.Ananda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 318? DAY OF AUGUST zoio

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE N. A:~iA.I\ii'}fA' '-if: .

CRIMINAL PETITION i'§o.423§;gg;_Q'  "   i _ .'

BETVVEEN:

Zakir Hussain

S/o M.C.Usman 

Aged about 25 Years V 
R/at1\Eo.37, 3"' Cross ' T .   ,
Minaj nagar, J.P.Nagar Post  '

Bangalore. ' t   2. .Petitioner

[By SIi.B.N..Si--3ivat€n:ri.a.=33i§ivoc.ate_«--foi-.I3.N.§t1ivanna 5:
Associates?  '    --  

AND:  H

State  Kuma1*»asw.ai1:iy--~I;ayo~ut Police Station,
Representedby Lear:aedP}'.  Respondent

{By._¢§fi.P,Kam’n’a_1{ar. Hoop}

‘fhis.;5etition is filed under section 439 Cr.P.C praying

t’oT_en1arge..the’petitioner on bail in Crime No.341/2010 of
“I_{i1nia1*asVw.aIny”” Layout Police Station, Bangalore City

registered”f’o_r~iV’an offence punishable under section 307 r/W

34″of iec) »

. This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court
made the following:

(3 R D E R

The petitioner is arrayed as accused No.1
No.34}/2010, registered for an offence _
section 307 r/w 34 EPC. A’ it b

2. I have heard learned counsefafor
FICGP for State. & t t t t t

3. I have been taken throuVgh:x’theV records.
which would reveal: wasunerfonned
on 22.07.2010; after arranged a

dinner near on first informant

had “:iz{;:-i§j’~. Tiiheufirst informant went to the
house of ‘petitionerjatnd:”fou–nd that food was not ready;

therefore, return-edA’–?_dacIi. In the meanwhile, at about 9.45

were was”~a–«”scuffle between one Prabha and

first informant again reached the house of

Ifietitioner questioned as to why his associates had

assaulted; Cfhinnappa. At that time, petitioner became wild

it »~q&ueHstioned them and first informant returned back. The

gm ‘

petitioner and other accused are alieged to have assaulted
first informant. The petitioner is alleged to have assauited

first informant with a hockey stick and instiga-ted.’__’ot1:ei’._

accused to kill first informant as he had_e_o’n1e his

house to disturb the function.

4. On consideration of contents of*first_ in’fo1’11’1at.i.on–i1and –. L’

background of occurrence. 1 fin_d:Vaets~.attri}.:iuted to vbetitioner
do not prima facie a.i;’iractA ‘tan;oifencedpbunishable under
section 307 11°C.. ‘i’herefor.é_.f-detentionv_ ofpetitioner during

investigationand f.’1*’iai would Vbea measui-‘e of punishment.

5- iguaccepted. The petitioner is

released on«’.bail–, t iolloadng conditions:–

i. execute a bond for a sum of
I ¥’i{-Rtifiees Fifty Thousand only} and shall
‘=_offe’r For the like sum to the satisfaction of

‘”‘l’juriSdictaional Court…

11. petitioner shall not intimidate or tamper with

V rosecution wit.nesses.

III. The petitioner shall regularly attend the Court.

ga:g

?fl&5§ %

SNN