Zeena Educational Society vs State Of Karnataka on 21 July, 2009

IR’ ‘THE HXGH CGXIRT OF §(ARNATA§{,A. AT

mamas rnzs TI-{E 215* may or J:3L?;””2o!€’;§f

was HQZTBLE M&JB’$T1fiE ;3;3.1¥5;’i*Vz:;-V. ‘ 1′

wart mwrxox m.19m5 cs?’ 29:99 (IV-::”:«;§i.?:zéG¥’;?i2″‘

BE1’§’WEE;?€

?;E2E;N§a E§§3ijCfiTEQN;’=,-J; i$::0c:m?if* V
}’aE€’EC§ES’TER§2E} S€3C’£E’T£’Y_ ‘ * T ‘

s«2:3y1*1’$ SacRE:*I’AI;i$z_ ._ ‘
8RIpM,S¢JANA_R’B__§–IAN7A s§2’E::*:’%z
&GEED§xE3{3§;E’E’%$.S;.YRSi._
;»s:E:$*:’:+1R:4.;:>;:a1_,:¢a,_«_v_ ~ .
AR§;B§C ”

Bammegzg»-i.4::s,, ~ Pm’:*:r~sE§

::3§? at 4:3 ;+§;g:’~mv:_~»L,rA*s, Aim;

AND :>

” ,S’i’fi;’f’E: <3? KAR%€AT&KA
1 __:2:E:_? BY ITS—-P§3'iE*€CI?fi,L SECRETARY
:'921:=»§g§¥ ANS SEC{}£'€§;3.Za2":' ED§,%CA'E"'£ON ,,
~ '::s:«:;:?;Ai§~2':':«;§Er~€'I', §az£.s.B2_H:,D§r~1G
* _ %3A:'~:'C;£fi_:GQ Em 1

" .__:% .£'.35'E;;{!Z%£§_;£SSI{}§'~§E£R FOR

§3UBiLE'C E§'§S'F¥REJCT'§GN
~~ AE?EPfiR'§'FviEE'sf?' GE' ?;§UC;%'E'§%Z}§'°J

–‘NRU§’s5sTUNG;% EQAD,
BANGA LB}? 8-3}

“gé aapmy EERECTGR 0;?

WJBLEC IZ*$S’FRL}{IZ’§’l{fJN
8&N{3AL{}RE NQRTR
BfiNGz5sLORE»G2 RESPff)NDELE’~§’§’S

{By Sri.R’F.SA’FYANARAE’A§V’A SENSE, I~3C,2{§~P.}

3. Having hetard the ieaxned counsal f 0r ‘the

patties and an considemficn {if the mate1:ialS_.Q_1;:1 “I

fine} that the facts in this casa am S’:-}’}f¥.”,iiI;’;=;”J;__”” 0233:: V’

imzalved in Writ Petition Nos.§3g9%1¥i§3Q5gf&?.,QfC3’§f”‘ :g[m%gf

the Same, 3 similar ezficr d€s::i’>;2f6§–._té be paSi€~:fi€3.

casa as wail.

4. In Elm .I;§£;-‘tlit, in
part. The Vidfi A:z1ne>:é.§n* The 3*” resporident shali