Posted On by &filed under Criminal Law News.

Mercy petitions of 17 people on death row are pending before President Pratibha Patil, reply to a Right to Information (RTI) application has revealed. Most of the pleas are from those convicted of murder or rape.
In reply to information sought under the RTI Act by Subhash Chandra Agarwal, the President’s Secretariat said the oldest petition was from 2005, while six mercy petitions were submitted to her office in 2011
The petition of Sushil Murmu from Jharkhand, who was convicted of killing a nine-year-old child for a religious ritual, has been pending since 2005. Another case is of Jafar Ali, who is facing the death penalty for murdering his wife and daughters. He applied for the president’s mercy Aug 21, 2006.
Gurmeet Singh submitted his mercy petition Dec 11, 2009, after he was held guilty of murdering 13 of his family members.
Meanwhile, the reply also said that the president had commuted 10 to life imprisonment following mercy petitions. In 2009 alone, death sentences of seven convicts had been commuted to life imprisonment.
In May, President Patil rejected the mercy plea of Mahendra Nath Das alias Govinda Das.
Das severed the head of 68-year-old Harakanta Das, secretary of the Guwahati Truck Drivers Association , in Guwahati in 1996. He was sentenced to death by a sessions court in 1997.
Another mercy plea rejected by the president was of Devinder Pal Singh Bhullar, who has been given the death penalty in a 1993 car bombing case in New Delhi.
Bhullar, a former Khalistan Commando Force militant, was given the death penalty in 2001 by a Delhi court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). Despite the hue and cry from several political parties and religious groups, the president’s office has not received any application for reconsidering Bhullar’s mercy plea.
Bhullar’s mercy petition was rejected May 8, 2011. However, the reply to the RTI application did not mention the mercy petition filed by Afzal Guru, awarded the death sentence in the December 2001 attack on parliament, as it has not yet been forwarded to the president.
Earlier, in reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha during the budget session in February, the home ministry had said that Afzal Guru’s petition has not been forwarded to the president and his case was “under
examination”. Afzal Guru was found
guilty of plotting the Dec 13, 2001, parliament attack, in which nine people were killed. He was sentenced to death in 2002, while the Delhi High Court confirmed the penalty in 2003.
The  last execution in India was carried out in Kolkata in August 2004, when Dhananjoy Chatterjee was hanged for raping and killing a school girl. Mercy petitions can be sent to either the president’s office or the home ministry. According to Section 72 of the Indian Constitution, there is no stipulated time limit for the president to consider the petitions.
President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam decided only two mercy petitions – in 2004, he rejected the plea of rape convict Dhananjoy Chatterjee, and in 2006 he commuted convict Kheraj Ram’s death penalty to life imprisonment.
President K.R. Narayanan did not clear any mercy petition.

One Response to “17 mercy petitions pending before president”

  1. vijay

    It is good at least P Secretariat is sensible enough to reply to RTI case. In my case, they blame ministries by citing AOB rules. When I registered public grievance in the first week of Sept. 2011 (vide Regn.No.14605), P Secretariat referred the issue to JS/MOH and washed off and seldom they the ministries send replies. Similar is the case of Ministry of Personnel, PG and Railways. At least in this aspect P Secretariat forward and put on the website for citizen to see what is the status. Ministries especially, RailwayPersonnel Ministry, etc., never bother to send replies and if at all, they send replies such as “abcdefg…..” as if they (the public servants functioning in Rail Bhavan only know alphabets like LKG children). But forget their duty and responsibility towards society.
    It should be noted here that power to do the work can be delegated to the lower level. But nevertheless responsibility and accountability cannot be delegated. It is better if P Secretariat individual public servants note this aspect and secy. to president/CS take cognizance of this aspect.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *