SC notice to Ramdev on book publisher’s plea against HC order

New Delhi:The Supreme Court Friday issued notice to Yoga guru Ramdev on a plea by a publisher challenging the Delhi High Court’s verdict restraining sale and publication of a book purportedly on his life.

The high court had passed the restraining order after Ramdev claimed that the book had defamatory content.

The apex court listed the matter for further hearing in first week of February next year.

“We will issue notice to Respondent 1 (Ramdev),” a bench of justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta said.

The publisher, Juggernaut Books Private Limited, approached the apex court challenging the high court’s September 29 judgement.

Earlier, Ramdev had filed the plea in the high court against the book titled “Godman To Tycoon” The Untold Story of Baba Ramdev, saying the book, purportedly on his life, had defamatory content and harmed his economic interests and reputation.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the publisher, told the apex court bench that there were “some significant” and “very interesting issues” in the matter.

The bench also asked why the publisher has made e-commerce websites Amazon India and Flipkart Internet Private Limited, which were earlier selling the book online, parties in the plea.

“Why do you want Amazon and Flipkart (as parties) unnecessarily in this,” the bench asked and issued notice to Ramdev only.

The high court in its September verdict, restraining the sale, publication and distribution of the book, had said the right to reputation of a living individual cannot be “crucified” at the “altar of the right to freedom of speech and expression” of another.

It had said the publisher was restrained from selling and publishing the book till the time the alleged objectionable portion was deleted. 

Ramdev had approached the high court to set aside a trial court order removing the ban on the publication and sale of the book.

In August last year, an additional civil judge had restrained the publisher from publishing and selling the book till further orders. It had also restrained Amazon India and Flipkart Internet Pvt Ltd from selling it online and stop its pending deliveries to buyers.

On April 28 this year, however, an additional senior civil judge (ASCJ) had removed the ban.

The book is penned by journalist Priyanka Pathak Narain.

The high court had restrained the publishing of the book, saying the person about whom the book is written is a “living human being” who was entitled to be treated with dignity.

It also said that the portions of the book “which make readers think that he is an ambitious villain”, until so proved in the court of law, are necessarily to be restrained from being published and distributed for sale till disposal of the case pending before the lower court.

The book was released on July 29, 2017, and Ramdev had approached the trial court on August 4 that year.

The high court had stayed an order of the ASCJ lifting the ban on publication and sale of the book. It had also granted interim relief to Ramdev while hearing his plea challenging the ASCJ’s order.

Ramdev’s counsel had claimed that the allegations in the book relating to the Yoga guru’s life were incorrect.

The author, however, had told the high court that at the end of the book, there were extracts of the facts, including details of persons whom she had interviewed before writing the book.

The publisher had said the extracts of the material in the book were already in public domain since 2007 and Ramdev had never raised any objection. The counsel said the entire record of the trial court has not been placed before the high court.

SC asks UP to place before it rules on grant of remission to convicts

The Supreme Court Monday asked the Uttar Pradesh government to apprise it whether the state has made some guidelines or rules for granting remission to convicts lodged in jails.

A bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur, S Abdul Nazeer and Deepak Gupta asked this question to the counsel appearing for Uttar Pradesh while it was hearing a plea filed by four persons who have served around 25 years in jail after being convicted in a dacoity case.

“What are your (Uttar Pradesh) rules for remission?”, the bench asked the counsel.

The counsel said in that earlier the state government had come out with a rule which said that convicts who have been in jail for 25 years would be eligible for grant of remission and be released from the prison.

The rule was challenged in the high court which had quashed it, he said.

The lawyer also said that one of the four petitioners before the apex court has died while three have served 25 years in jail.

The bench granted bail to the three convicts — Rajjan, Hira Lal and Rambha — and asked the Uttar Pradesh government to place before it the rules for grant of remission to convicts lodged in jails in the state.

The apex court said that since the three convicts have already served 25 years in jail, it was an appropriate case to grant them bail.