High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Mousmi D.D.T.Chhirkao Karamcha vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 4 April, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Mousmi D.D.T.Chhirkao Karamcha vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 4 April, 2011
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CWJC No 2045 of 2006
       1   Mousmi DDT Chhirkao Karamchari Sangh, District Branch, Samastipur, P O, P
           S & District - Samastipur through its Secretary Guru Sharan Sahni, son of Sri
           Ram Sakal Sahni resident of village - Jitwarpur Nizamat, P O - Samastipur
           College, P S - Mufassil, District - Samastipur
       2   Mahesh Rai, son of Rameshwar Rai, President of Mousmi DDT Chhirkao
           Karamchari Sangh, District Branch, Samastipur and resident of village -
           Hakimabad, P O - Kharaj - Jitwarpur, P S - Mufassil, District - Samastipur
       3   Ram Bhahdur Paswan, son of Sri Maghan Paswan, Vice President of Mousmi
           DDT Chhirkao Karamchari Sangh, District Branch, Samastipur and resident of
           village - Ekawara, P O & P S - Singhia, District - Samastipur
       4   Guru Sharan Sahni, son of Sri Ram Sakal Sahni, Secretary of Mousmi DDT
           Chhirkao Karamchari Sangh, District Branch, Samastipur and resident of
           village - Zitwarpur Nizamat, P O - Samastipur College, P S - Mufassil,
           District - Samastipur
       5   Raj Kumar Mahto, son of Sri Domi Mahto, Joint Secretary of Mousmi DDT
           Chhirkao Karamchari Sanch, District Branch, Samastipur and resident of
           village - Bhuswar, P O - Bibhutipur, P S - Bibhutipur, District - Samastipur
       6   RAjendra Mahto, son of late Bhulo Mahto, Treasurer of Mousmi DDT
           Chhirkao Karamchari Sangh, District Branch, Samastiur and resident of village
           & P O - Kapan, P S - Bibhutipur, District - Samastipur
       7   District Magistrate, Samastipur                         -       Petitioners
                                      Versus
       1    The State of Bihar
       2    The Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna
       3    The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna
       4    The Chief Malaria Officer, Bihar, Patna
       5    The District Malaria Officer, Samastipur
       6    The Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna
       7    The Executive Director -cum- Special Secretary, State Health Society Bihar,
            Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, Patna
       8    Dr A K Tiwari, I/c Malaria and Kalazar Division, State Health Society, Bihar,
            Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, Patna               -       Respondents
                                     -----------

4 04.04.2011 Petitioner No 1 is an Association of seasonal employees and

petitioners No 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 are its office bearers. They are also

seasonal workers and members of the said Association. Their case is that

they have been engaged year after year for a month or so in a year for

spraying DDT in kalazar endemic areas. It appears that in 1991

(Annexure-11 to the supplementary affidavit), Government took a

decision that the seasonal workers involved in spraying DDT should be
2
empanelled for preferential treatment in matters of regular employment as

Class-IV employees. Directions were, accordingly, issued. The

grievance of the petitioners is that so far as Samastipur is concerned, even

though the District Malaria Officer, as per counter affidavit, has sent the

name for empanelment to the District Collector, the District Collector has

not notified the panel and in absence thereof, Class-IV vacancies are

being considered and filled up without considering the cases of the

petitioners.

This matter was twice earlier adjourned for District

Magistrate, Samastipur to file an appropriate counter affidavit in the

matter. Learned counsel for the State states that twice, by FAX, District

Magistrate, Samastipur has been noticed to give instructions in the matter

but he has chosen not to respond. This matter is pending before this Court

since 2006. In my view, there is no point in keeping the matter pending

any longer.

The first thing this Court is like to clarify is that petitioners

have rightly restricted relief to empanelment in the panel of seasonal DDT

sprayers in the Department of Malaria. They do not seek employment by

virtue of their empanelment because there is no policy of the Government

to give employment only to such empanelled persons. Once any vacancy

in Class-IV arises at district level on which District Magistrate -cum-

Collector is competent to make appointment, it would have to be

advertised and applications from all persons, desirous and qualified,

would be called for. If petitioners are empanelled in such a panel, while

selection is being made, preference may be given to them with age
3
relaxation beyond which nothing more is to be done.

In that view of the matter, I direct the District Magistrate –

cum- Collector, Samastipur to act on the recommendation of the list, as

submitted by the District Malaria Officer to him in the year 2008, and,

accordingly, prepare a panel which, as stated above, would be taken into

account when any vacancy arises as such. The said actions of preparing a

panel and notifying it would be done by the District Magistrate -cum-

Collector, Samastipur within two months of production of a copy of order

of this Court before him. The responsibility of carrying out the directions

of this Court would be squarely upon the District Magistrate aforesaid. If

the District Magistrate does not prepare such a panel within the period

specified above, petitioners would be at liberty to initiate proceedings in

contempt as against him before this Court.

With these observations and directions, the writ petition is

disposed of.

M.E.H./                                         (Navaniti Prasad Singh)