High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Abhishek Mishra @ Sudhu Mishra vs State Of Bihar on 26 November, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Abhishek Mishra @ Sudhu Mishra vs State Of Bihar on 26 November, 2010
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Cr.Misc. No.39451 of 2010
       ABHISHEK MISHRA @ SUDHU MISHRA, S/o Ram Nath Mishra.
                               Versus
                        THE STATE OF BIHAR
                              -----------

02. 26.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Sections 379 and 285 of the Indian

Penal Code and Section 7 of the E.C. Act.

Considering that the petitioner is in custody

since 13.09.2010 and he has fair antecedent, let the

petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing

bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the

Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Samastipur in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No.

62 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That

one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner

who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is

related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be

the brother of the petitioner namely Ajit Mishra. The

bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is

any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the

affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an

accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be

released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on
2

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature

after his release in the present case and thereafter the

court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-