IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26?" DAY OF NOVEMBER 2o:yoE',:E:EEEyy BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRJUSTECE MOHA_N..$HANTA'NE§]?§VOU£)A.R E E C.M.P. No.35/Eoxea = BETWEEN : E E E i-I.A. Krishnappa Aged about 72 years V ' S/o late Abbayappa Sankey Anjaneyaswamy Temple, Gayathrjlfievé:P'a'rkCi: . . Vyaiikaval, ..Petiti0ner (By M/s. Lawyers Inc.,) AND:_. Harish _ V Aged about 38' years V' .5/c,.._Ramwachandragjpa' 'V w_ .i\:£o..Z_-;04V, VII-;B~.,Cross J'akk'u!i Layout. Be§2.gal6G!'fu-i5€§0'V 064. V E Arz'd'als'cV>:A.a't No.31,Etf)eshpete Road * _Baybay.byyanagui Circle 'Budagere Post, Devanahalli Taluk Bengalooru Rural District. ..Respond_ent (By Sré B.R. Vishwanath, Adv.,) This CM? is filed under Section .oi'3t"heu Arbitration and Conciliation Act, jprayi:'ig' that this ' Horfble Court may be pleased to jappoir1t~a"«SoIe' Art:1it.1fato1j to adjudicate the dispute that has afiseri_"be'twee.n"the peti'tioiiei' and the respondent.
This CMP coming on fof’ve«a?dmissiohittxisv-idaflfé the Court
made the following:~
im
Petitioner’. vhas:.Aen»te’reVd agreement with
the respo4nEjen;i:j2′;:_foi: ‘:.p1;fireha._sing’_ property bearing
No. 19, V|V,_ Banga lore, measu ring
45’:-<29' andV:".pl.f!'4$U8VtiVi.f:"t(§ agreement, the
respondent rexeeivedi -v._aCi_\u/anace consideration of
?1S;0.l,OCQ}'.– the"pe«tit'ioner, Thereafter, disputes
have'*sg_ta'rt_ed,.:whieii..s_aije yet to be resoived. There was
:t.'vVVeAxc.hange.._o%f notiteesttlby the parties. The agreement of
"staie_e'ntered"i.nto between the parties is produced at
to the petition. Ciause 10 of the
V'
agreement contains the arbitration clause. The
petitioner issued notice to the respondent invok-in'g:g"'t.he
arbitration ciause as per Annexure~B. Hc-*ii\é'e\rer;'t-'t'iiie_re
no agreement was arrived Zatfforé "appoiiIit_m:ent of i
Arbitrator.
2. During the course -o_i*h%eari’rig_, t:h’é”’iearned” ‘
advocates agreed that then-~r–rtattéi=c_may”‘be. referred to
Arbitrai Tribunai for the disputes
between the,oiar’ties;A,A agreed that Sri
Kukkajei ‘Bah’a~tv,~~ Retired District 3udge,
may aiapointedVa’sv_.VSo:i:’e_.’Arbitrator.
_ The”*sai’dVstsbirniissiiions are recorded. Accordingly,
tiiv:’:e:”i~Eog_i–iowing o’rd’e*r’i’s made:–
Ramakrishna Bhat, Retired District
Judge, F–113, 4C, 4″‘ Floor, Central
AAChaf%i.b?2rS, 2″ Main fiad, Gandhinagar,