High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Amod Kumar Nirala vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 22 December, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Amod Kumar Nirala vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 22 December, 2010
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                        CWJC No.4951 of 2010
                   AMOD KUMAR NIRALA S/O SHRI BINDESHWARI MOCHI R/O
                   VILL.- FATEHPUR (SADANANDPUR), P.S.- BALIA, DISTT.-
                   BEGUSARAI
                                                     Versus
                   1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY,
                   DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION, GOVT.
                   OF BIHAR, PATNA
                   2.     THE        DISTRICT          MAGISTRATE-CUM-COLLECTOR,
                   BEGUSARAI
                   3. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, BEGUSARAI
                   4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, BEGUSARAI
                   5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,
                   BEGUSARAI
                   6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BALIA, BEGUSARAI
                   7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BALIA,
                   DISTT.- BEGUSARAI
                   8. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ FATEHPUR, P.S.
                   BALIA, BEGUSARAI
                   9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY/PANCHAYAT SEVAK, GRAM
                   PANCHAYAT RAJ FATEHPUR, P.S. BALIA, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI
                   10. THE HEAD MASTER, MIDDLE SCHOOL, SADANANDPUR,
                   P.S.- BALIA, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI
                   11. MEERA KUMARI W/O SHRI SANJEEV KUMAR R/V
                   FATEHPUR          (SADANANDPUR),          P.S.- BALIA, DISTT.-
                   BEGUSARAI
                                                 -----------

For the petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kumar Ambastha.

For the State: Mr. Krishna Chandra Jha, AC to SC 4.

02. 22.12.2010 Let the petitioner approach the District Employment

Appellate Authority with grievance including challenge, if any, to

annexure-2, if he so desires.

No interference is warranted at this stage in this writ

application.

The writ application is disposed of with above observation.

rkp                                              ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)