Gujarat High Court High Court

And vs Heard on 13 December, 2010

Gujarat High Court
And vs Heard on 13 December, 2010
Author: B.J.Shethna,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice H.B.Antani,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

OJA/18/2007	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

 


 

O.J.APPEAL
NO. 18 OF 2007
 

 


 

IN


 

 


 

COMPANY
PETITION NO. 153 OF 2005
 

 
=========================================================

 

SHRI
PATEL KANIYALAL H. KUNJBIHARI 

 

AND
OTHERS - Appellants
 

Versus
 

ELECTRON
COLOUR CHEM PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER - Opponents
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
AMAR N BHATT for the
Appellants.  
MR HARDIK C RAWAL for Opponent : 1. 
OFFICIAL
LIQUIDATOR for Opponent :
2. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR. JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 08/02/2007 

 

 
 


 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA)

1. Heard
Shri Amar Bhatt for the appellants and Shri Hardik Raval for the main
contesting respondent No. 1. It is stated at the Bar by the learned
Counsel for the parties that the parties have settled their disputes
outside the Court and, therefore, in terms of the consent arrived at
between the parties, the order passed by the learned Company Judge on
15-09-2006 in Company Petition No. 153 of 2005 be quashed and set
aside and the appeal be allowed accordingly.

2. In
view of the above, the consent terms is ordered to be placed on
record and the order of winding up passed by the learned Company
Judge on 15-09-2006 in Company Petition No. 153 of 2005 is hereby
quashed and set aside. Appeal is allowed accordingly. The resultant
effect is that the possession taken over by the Official Liquidator,
in pursuance of the order passed by the learned Company Judge, has to
be restored back to the appellants. Therefore, the Official
Liquidator is directed to hand-over the possession to the appellants.

[B.

J. SHETHNA, J.]

[H.

B. ANTANI, J.]

/shamnath

   

Top