High Court Karnataka High Court

Anil Kumar @ Anil Sait vs State Of Karnataka on 4 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Anil Kumar @ Anil Sait vs State Of Karnataka on 4 June, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi


,, WW .WM,,’ ‘dflflkh W. ‘alum-m’%:tr£A”0§w5€£ M…” amamvcwmzi wwwwmu. mm Icuwwwwwwuvmwwg zrwmm wwzwemfi ‘€«.W”‘ ia*\.»%%W$M%§*=€s%m NEW??? fifi

3% ‘§’E*§ Efififi €CZ@.,§§’I” GE’ §i2%,Rf§2’£Tg%§fi $5? 33. ”

mzram *3-:13 ‘E’?-E3 mi my GE’ ..§§,§E~§£ 2§s§¢3%7j%%-<MiTi%

BEP%RE

mg mrvmag; Eafi. L.;':%3'2'§s@%§:%%?:§;r;r3;§§gs_2§%%§§§. L
$§§IvE¥§AL zfimwziszss z~::;:e;3;a{5éé §* ¢*2::@a: %

E3 ?WEE?s”‘;

ma K’f.}§fs.R@2%§E;S:”‘::}?’§”
gm :.m*E C»kL,$§§§’I’ ._ r
.&£3E§ mag? 3a_vEA3a$.. _ ‘


13% $3933, ”

%
B,.i€’-LI!¥§A§..fl§iE}. ‘ ‘

?E’?3f§”I{}§*¥ER
§§E”‘:’ mm; my”;

éfifi:

V§$?’i’.~§;T§’§- é§1}%K&&3?~g:&?m§.%”” ‘V
=3? £3 _3fE.$§§§¢f5’+3’1%§E?%§R mzisfi

~ §§;’§§’$E¥I3§§”i’*

,% ‘ §EL>E: $3: §1,’§1 J;% §§.{:..;::’:g?s2

X ‘””I’4’§I~;§§S amgmg yzzggfi gig é:’§§%E.}fb}

T§’£’iEi.£€_;P&§s’£mG Efi 33%’ @E 1%.: mzmmmxg mg

% -sm~=’::’s3m S? TEES I4§§2*3″B£»;Efi QQEEEE’? §§

= §’..ZE§…5.§§§%,3fi§3£E2i3$$ 8′? E23 fimfig msszw i*’?,§;2%Ee
A » ” ~ .aL:;”;§; “mg fi..?PL§€;*£?§@I’L

TE’§§S FEZTTFZSPI fififiéfififi GE? FQR £3R§ER$ *1?-11$
lfiéfif} 33$ if»EI}”£§§§’ ‘VEEE QQELQ

-um»-‘-wvow wwmnwmu wt’:-‘ InM'”w.mMfi#”§.E£@”%¥’%.?’fi< fl"fii'\3§"3 Kwfimqfifiqggtfi kg?"

$3333

Tifi gatiiian :13 Eiaé £333' reiamétimzz af :':.:_§::i:iri'&3;:

gm in bag? wags: cigtgsfi 1?§.i2%5

8&3}-If in £ri.?.E%'a93§23§ Qfififig

3. This Smart:

mark Efi pzmaaflm hfifam f§
‘z’am§maz”§.1:§1§vr 1’ _na*m:§ H Ewsflagug,
fiflwmn §€},{}i3 &_.m.., I.

3. tim ytitfimxzm iae
§u%%§&éE§§.¢%§&4-23: and 3% 4232′ mg Sinsfi
$38 gmggg am mfi cmgéaémam the

:3? aazzfiitian Eafi Ea miamé.

V” §&ééti’:%2m fig ailawafi. Tm pafiiianar mzmti

_;”é3£.§$ %a§:3m fiw Stafimm. E’-§..,m.me fifiaiztzmg

Paficaz Sigaifiamg in filiiifia

sal-

Iudge

Vfifl