High Court Kerala High Court

Annamma vs Circle Inspector Of Police on 2 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
Annamma vs Circle Inspector Of Police on 2 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 7827 of 2007()


1. ANNAMMA, S M, VETTOLIL (H),
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SREEKUMAR

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :02/01/2008

 O R D E R
                           R.BASANT, J.
                        ----------------------
                        B.A.No.7827 of 2007
                    ----------------------------------------
           Dated this the 2nd day of January 2008

                               O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner is the

second accused. She was working as store keeper in the

Government Hospital during the period 1996-2000. The crux of

the allegations against the petitioner is that certain machinery

available in the hospital were found missing. The petitioner

along with the co-accused was allegedly responsible for misuse/

misappropriation of the said machinery. Investigation is in

progress. The petitioner apprehends imminent arrest.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the alleged incident had taken place more than a decade back.

Arrest and incarceration of the petitioner is unnecessary. The

petitioner shall co-operate with the investigators. The petitioner

may, in these circumstances, be granted anticipatory bail, it is

prayed.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the

application; but prays that appropriate conditions may be

imposed in the interests of a fair, efficient and expeditious

investigation.

B.A.No.7827/07 2

4. Having considered all the relevant circumstances, I

am satisfied that this is a fit case where directions under Section

the 438 Cr.P.C can be issued in favour of the petitioner, a

woman, subject to appropriate terms and conditions.

5. In the result, this petition is allowed. Following

directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C in favour of the

petitioner.

i) Petitioner shall surrender before the learned

Magistrate having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 09/01/2008. She

shall be released on regular bail on condition that she executes a

bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand only) with two

solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the

learned Magistrate.

ii) The petitioner shall make herself available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m

and 3 p.m on 10/01/2008 and 11/01/2008. During this period,

the investigating officer shall be at liberty to interrogate the

petitioner in custody and take all necessary steps for the proper

investigation of this case. Thereafter the petitioner shall so

appear on all Mondays between 10 a.m and 12 noon for a period

of two months and subsequently as and when directed by the

investigating officer in writing to do so.

B.A.No.7827/07 3

(iii) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to

arrest the petitioner and deal with her in accordance with law, as

if these directions were not issued at all.

(iv) If she were arrested prior to 09/01/2008, she shall be

released from custody on her executing a bond for Rs.50,000/-

(Rupees fifty thousand only) without any sureties, undertaking to

appear before the learned Magistrate on 09/01/2008.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

B.A.No.7827/07 4

B.A.No.7827/07 5

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007