CWP No. 11201 of 2006 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
CWP No. 11201 of 2006
Date of decision: September 17, 2008
Ashwani Kumar --- Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & others ---- Respondents
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta
Present: Mr. SS Toor, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for
respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate, for
respondent No. 3.
Ashutosh Mohunta, J (Oral.
Petitioner prays for issuance of a direction to the
respondents to consider his application for appointment to the post
of ETT teacher. He has applied for the said post in pursuance of the
advertisement Annexure P1.
Counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 submits that the
petitioner could not be selected because the lowest merit in his
category secured a score of 123.21, whereas the petitioner had
secured only 92.82 score.
CWP No. 11201 of 2006 2
Counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 further submits that
the case of the petitioner was not considered because he had
secured 92.82 marks, i.e. less than the minimum prescribed score
of 100.
Thus on both the counts, the petitioner was not eligible
to be selected as ETT teacher. There is no merit in the present writ
petition. The same is hereby dismissed.
[Ashutosh Mohunta]
Judge
[Rajan Gupta]
Judge
September 17, 2008
`ask’