' ":311§.:,R.a,t:1':_1a3nma1«;.S.
' fg!.:1y~--:?,+::~i¢ it Baaavaraj, Adv.)
:24 mg HIGH comm' 01:' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE:
DATEQ Tms THE 1';'TH my 0? sgwamggm 209$.
BEFORE 1' V'
THE Hozmm MR..JtI$'§'ICE s. £15i§I;37tZ':'1»'l9fI'.z1«f';'#E_:Vl'.7§"rl:§iV:v
war: PETITIQH 39.12am/2oef"3
BETWEEN:
1, S311. Rathnawa N. I-I<:;.s:*.+.::sTg{3*;1?s:1'e:z11* ' "
Wfe). J}-i. i'§am,a§)pa V _ .
Aged abeut V "
Mana:an%La'§%'3«ai€a--:-_V _ '
Behind. 'i.'x'§xI.'1;C«q:_11€gé'
f)ava_11age_zi§f[_.. --
2; Sri,A,':";}i£1Tisi1VV
S30, Latgz; Suhha' R39
Ag§:-- about years "
D:-gr N{3.258 1}'-.140 _
i-'.P11Iwiaifl--;R0ad
' =:sz:_.c:.g::.v.fA{B2oc1<
VD_3;va:::~';g%::ré':A.T._ " '_.
Wg' G. v'--Shr':kka§pa S. Najk
£§gé:(1a7E:'5h"_.Cross, 13.3. Extn.
Eavanagerc .. PE'"E'§'T'i«;)NER:~}
AN}? :
1, Thfi State of Karnataka
By its S€tc:*eta1'y
Department of C«01fI1111t3I'<:f:
Ami Ine:lust:t"ies;
MP8! Building b
Bangaioré ~» $68 691 '
EN}
The Spscial Lana ACC;11i.Siti()I1 QffiC€1"7__ V' _ A ~ ~
Eiamataka industrial Area Dcvcigypmcut E»:-a:<;i A
Zonal Office
Nmpaihu11g.a Road
Bangalore
3. Thfj Dcvelepment Qfficfiéf "
Karnataka Exzdustxial 1X:g*:?:a_§3--f:v::§.0pzz1k5i:i Baejti
Lckikerc :n coming on for Prelimi:1ar§»* Hearing
'B' '€3:'c::1jgs--fi:i:%_ éiafgg. Court mafia {ha foficwfizg;
ORDER
In this case, the pt:t,i¥:£¢3ners contend that _tf_§éy _
owners of sites canred out cf Sy. No.5
Davanagcrt Taluk, Davanagere L geéfiriofiévzis .’
have pmduced a copy of thflir’ sale déegis as L.
C ta C3 respectively. Kt v..wC’0t_1tc:1t’it:€1’&_VVA :}I’;he Em’
respondent has acqnit3:r:j(i._ :.1;:11tc17-.;x?itho£ttVAt10tice as
provided under Section 28(2) Industrial
Area Developr;1’e’ntL:VZ1f5oa:t::i z”_.t”.?€.’,’; 2
V171′. 2 Lcaxézssii-»._LCQ1ii;sEI– fiat 2nd and 3″ rcspondgnts
subnzits t;i3.at” latxds qtiestiou have bE.’6I1 acquired 1’11
they is fi1rther submitted that a meeting
of Committee under the chairmanship of the
;’°?°°
“r
Qffiflfl
:7uz>G zé .
DEp3.1ty* .””‘~Cori3V’nfissioner, Davangerc, was held on
28;’€38.2.i}O8 The committee has .recomm¢:*1:1cied for payment
::>f; gromvpénsafion Rs. 155/ – per 3q.£or the; residcntiaiiy
‘ A.c£mv.éx’ted pmpertiesl sites.
it is submitted that the
ptztitioners also being the pumhassrs of sites may make
it
96 go;
appropriate application seeking paymernt sf coxnfiénééation
and the autllorities will cxaminc such it,
found that they are enfifled for be’ .
paid compensation at the afc> zesajdA rai:et..’ it
submitted that thc 2113 and-._3’d 333?: ;
similar stand in an identica’,i I;:V’;§:£t£;r ‘~’..’.«*’,_ ff.’V’:No:§f»610{2O08
disposed of an Vs. The
Siam of a statement 01″
obje<:rt;io11s.; ' the s"tat£;*.men£ of
ohjectiofis petition may also be
t1*cfi¥ted= as bfijefitifjn, .ft_I:iis'\rs%rit petitisn.
Ba-.321' Ifirarned Counsel for the petitioners
thaf V'tI1:…§:efitioncrs do net pmss the Writ petition
' 39 far z«_15§'v¥1;e challenge to the acquisition prociieéislgs are
._ ' ~ .
~ «A % i_<":Q..{¢.,5§2bc9:' –
T0333; –
* A .<;?<:n'ns:%:V:r'1fit:}::i, 'TI=Vi:i" they are paid compensafien at the rate sf
fig. V-éfper Sq. folr acqiiisifion of their lands.
* 1. A
Ki.
vs
–)€ Oasnrccézll
\/x’o%o.C.eua.t~ ‘W
0 r-z:9_45\,aQa9.e.J
f¢§'[0-c9.009-
C£’4’\9\(‘{)r:’
“».7UDG7i3~
4. ‘ Since the respondents have ”
campensation at the rate of Rs.155/– per s::;.PVfg):”-.tV.l3za.._}ia.r’1ci.°3
in question, it is not nficessary to
the acquisition pmcccdings ha{%i:_;gi”.V’.;~e:ga$ti:_~A is” n
submissiozl of the leaxned Ctmfizacl for
Consequently, I diréct v?.}:1.%;x >v__:3Y”(;{ ‘-ffis
gouciéntivto pay
% 3g. ____
1%
Compensation at the r*atte ciéf[_ ‘Afar acquiring
the site 1’11 vvéubject to the
petitioners ;%spt:ct of the said
lands ” H 1
Writ ;)£:tit:icf§’i1fi’a=a or accordingly. No costs.
Sd/-
Judge