High Court Karnataka High Court

B Dinakar Hegde vs The Regional Transport Authority on 7 September, 2009

Karnataka High Court
B Dinakar Hegde vs The Regional Transport Authority on 7 September, 2009
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda
resoiution of the 15' respondent, the 

approached this court to directfltwhe 2’i””‘res:p:onde:’

censider the representation and as=sig..n

It to ” ” it

3. Heard learned counse–i:ép.Dearingfor :’the1.petit¥oner V

and the learned AGA zfmgthe .rés;:’ao.:nr}Ve”it.ts.

4. Learned AAGA.:’_j:after;.o’_ the records

submitted trial; tmitggtheimzaregasetaxen up by the 2nd

respondent:’i’n.V”‘its::r:?heet§n.es; ‘i-t~vV.isv”%only on account of the

petitioner’– the timings in pursuance of

the reso!£rt§.on .¢:ifVVt¥1_e’A.1_”Vfespondent, could not be assigned.

It y.«§scon:en&ee.:ng:, the inaction alleged against the 2″”

» :fe’s§3on.dveni:4isineorrect. According to the learned ASA, it is

1′.th:e.~–.Vipetit¥’onerV’s.who did not appear before the 2″”

.V refiiondvent in the meetings convened for the purpose of

“e?sei.gAning the timings and hence, the grievance put ferth in

«i ‘tivrit petition is not tenable. However, learned AGA

T “‘s£.lbrnitted that, the 2″‘ respondent would inciude the

sebject relating to the assignment of timings even in

respect of the petitioner, in the next meeting and if the

/i”

petitioner were to appear, the matter would

in accordance with iaw.

5. Learned counsei for the

the petitioner would voluntariigr appear’ –b:efoVre”‘”‘t’he: .?.”°””

respendent and participate meei.i~ng;:so as to
enable the 2″” responde’nVt_a.to”aaaiggn_:tii:e’_»tlmi.ngs.

6. In xgiesézjwpof the by learned AGA,

it is «a¥:y..firleing with regard to the
aiieged in of 2″‘ respondent or the

iaches entifge part.of.the::_’petitioner.

I’in.Avie\rvi”ef’éthe above, the writ petition stands

L/__Ci’rg§§l2se;€.Lo’iVA’Vdiirecting the 2″” respondent to inciucie the

s’eigj:ect,.rei’al.ilng to assigning of timings to the stage

cerriageipermit of the petitioner in the next meeting and

V”~V’_A:a£§ei”Adecision thereon in accordance with Eaw.

8. It is made clear that, the 2″‘ respondent need not
issue any separate notice to the petitioner ‘:9 appear in the

next meeting scheeuiecl for the purpose of assigning

/

timings in respect of stage carriage permit.

shah voiuntariiy ascertain the date, time and ”

meeting and participate in the pro:’:ée’d’ings:, .g I

It is also made dear that ifvhthe–.petitieriet’d’oeS.«notH.L

appear in the next rneeting:’;va«a.:t’he resoltzt’§o.h the 1″ V

respondent granting stage cat’r”riaV§}’:e tierrnit \?idte”‘J§.nnexure
‘A’ shail stand lapsed,’ _;-‘eso'[fuat§’on was passed

more than a g’…*e’:_a_t’_iae aoo ariti e:ét;»e:at:§t ner has not shown

any earnestness the permit and

operate the set*viV§:e._

Ordered accordi’fi§_3_Iy. V

Sd/as
Judge