High Court Kerala High Court

Sajeev vs B. Salim on 7 September, 2009

Kerala High Court
Sajeev vs B. Salim on 7 September, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 903 of 2005()


1. SAJEEV, S/O. MAJEED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. B. SALIM, S/O. BASHEER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SHIJU, S/O. RAJAPPAN,

3. THE MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH (SR.)

                For Respondent  :SRI.MATHEWS JACOB (SR.)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :07/09/2009

 O R D E R
                      M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
               = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                 M.A.C.A. NO. 903 OF 2005
             = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
      Dated this the 7th day of September, 2009.

                       J U D G M E N T

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Irinjalakuda in O.P.(MV)1200/99.

The claimant, a 20 year old fish vendor, sustained injuries in

a road accident. He had sustained fracture of the right

scapula and had lost one tooth and was treated as an

inpatient in the hospital for three days. The Tribunal

awarded him a total compensation of Rs.36,274/- with 6%

interest. It is against that decision the claimant has come up

in appeal for enhancement.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant would argue

that no amount has been given for extra nutritious food and

that the compensation awarded for pain and sufferings is

inadequate and the disability compensation is also low as

well as the compensation towards loss of amenities and

enjoyment in life.

M.A.C.A. 903 OF 2005
-:2:-

3. Heard the learned counsel for both the sides. The

Doctor who had issued the certificate had been examined as

PW1 in this case. The Doctor was not in a definite position to

say whether there is real problem for him in gripping things.

He was not able to answer whether one can pretend.

Whatever it may be, this young man had suffered a fracture

on the scapula and he is expected to carryout manual

physical exertion everyday. Therefore I think some

enhancement can be given towards loss of amenities and

enjoyment in life. Similarly some reasonable amount can be

awarded for pain and sufferings and also for extra nutritious

food and other expenses. I increase the compensation for

pain and sufferings by Rs.2,000/-, loss of amenities by

Rs.2,000/- and extra nourishment and other expenses by

Rs.1,000/- thereby totaling a sum of Rs.5,000/-. The

Tribunal has only awarded an interest of 6% which has to be

enhanced to 7% for the entire amount.

In the result the MACA is partly allowed and disposed

of as follows. The claimant is awarded an additional

M.A.C.A. 903 OF 2005
-:3:-

compensation of Rs.5,000/- with 7% interest on the said

sum from the date of petition till realisation and the

respondent, insurance company is directed to deposit the

amount within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt

of a copy of the judgment. The insurance company is also

directed to pay an interest of 7% for the entire amount

already awarded.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-