V And; 'V
IN THE HIGH COURT 0%' KARNATAKA AT H
DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF ;\2<5V"EN£'13-DEé:R_:?2;()'ir3_
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR.JUS1'1VC»E1::ANAN]AI5
Regular Second .{\Dpee;1------l\uI.§)y,38G of 200.9
Between:
B.MahadeVaiah
Aged about 593-_ye2§;1"S_. , " _
8/ 0 Late Bas'aPP3..
R/at Ganagerepajya 9 . V. ..
Hosahalfi}"'Utta;:;fahéLE1'i Hob}-i
Bangaldre S0uth.Taluk' af360~0[E52
(By Sri A'e'1'vDcVete]
eeefi/eoeD1a€¢D'Rw"n£*shee
S1nAee.vndeCe%1s_e(ij;;1i$y her LRS.
D.RaVishVan_Kar
'V S/0 1.é1t.e "I).Kamesh
Aged about 48 years
A ,jR/31* N0285, 'Amn1a'
_ 'E'-?h'{fi1ir;)ss, 18* Block, Jayanagara
_ Bangalore -- 560 011
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Ix)
[By Sri Ravindranath P.V., Adyfocatev it ‘fore’ it
Caveator/ Respondent)
This regular second appeai fittedii’ur1de’r::i-3ectio1ji*::ue_i
100 CPC against the judgntient. and d..’eI.:ree’ ‘<:lt.'r
27.11.2008 passed in R.A.No_._1'~36/20-O5 on'-'of
the Presiding Officer, Fast Track_"Court¥'III,'Prl. District
Judge, Bangalore Rural District',"v.Ai1owing'-theypappeal
and etc. ' 'V «. .
This appealpcorning day, the
Court deliveredpthpe V « ”
“‘arising out of a suit for
permanentnow stated at the Bar, that
the subjectxim.at’ter of»the’~.-swuit has been acquired by the
” Byan-5§a:iore,: Deyelopnicnt Authority and therefore, neither
V”‘p’arty”wou}:dentitled to the relief of injunction, except
thatthere a dispute as to the entitiement of the
i1″»-w___’c0mperisation payable in respect of the property, which
dis” ‘the_:subject matter of acquisition. Which, however, is
the subject matter of this appeal. Accordingly, the
3
appeal is dismissed Without prejudice to the ‘
appellant or the respondent, to wo:;1{en’t their ‘fer
entitlement of the compensatipn.
Pmg/