IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Crl.MC.No. 1670 of 2006()
1. NIKESH, S/O. ARAVINDAKSHAN,
... Petitioner
2. MUNSHAD, S/O. MUHAMMED,
3. SAJEESH, S/O. SREEKUMAR,
4. SALIL KUMAR, S/O. SREEKUMAR,
5. SANTHOSH, S/O. DIVAKARAN,
6. SANOJ KUMAR, S/O. JAYADEVAN,
7. SASI, S/O. SREEDHARAN,
Vs
1. SUB - INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
... Respondent
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
For Petitioner :SRI.S.U.NAZAR
For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
Dated :09/11/2010
O R D E R
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.
--------------------------------------------------------
Crl.M.C No.1670 OF 2006
---------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 9th day of November, 2010.
O R D E R
Whether consumption of liquor in a lodging a room would
constitute an offence under Section 15C of Abkari Act is the
question.
2. Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chavakkad took
cognizance for the offence under Section 15C of Kerala Abkari Act
against accused Nos.1 to 7, on Annexure-II final report submitted
by Sub Inspector of Police Vadanappally. The prosecution case is
that on 6.6.2004 at about 3.10 a.m, petitioners were found
consuming liquor in Room No.14 of “Vellamkanni Matha” lodge. It
is alleged that they thereby committed an offence under Section
15C of Kerala Abkari Act. Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the cognizance taken
contending that the offence is not attracted.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
learned Public Prosecutor were heard.
4. Facts are not disputed. Petitioners were found consuming
liquor in Room No.14 of a residential lodge by name “Vellamkanni
Crl.M.C No.1670 OF 2006 2
Matha” lodge, at about 3.10 a.m. The question is whether
consumption of liquor in a room of a lodging house would attract
an offence under Section 15C of the Act.
5. Section 15C of Kerala Abkari Act reads thus:-
“15C. Consumption of liquor in public places.- No person
shall consume liquor in any public place unless consumption of
liquor in any such place is permitted under a licence granted by
the Commissioner.
Explanation I:- For the purpose of this section, “Public
place”means any street, Court, Police Station [or other public
office or any club] or any place of public amusement or resort
or on board any passenger boat or vessel or any public
passenger vehicle, or a dining or refreshment room in a
restaurant, hotel, rest-house, travellers bungalow or tourists’
bungalow where different individuals or groups of persons
consume food, but shall not include any private residential
room.
Explanation II:- For the purpose of explanation I, “public
passenger vehicle”means a vehicle used for carrying
passengers for hire or reward other than a vehicle which carries
passengers for hire or reward under a contract, express or
implied for the use of the vehicle as a whole at or for a fixed or
agreed rate or sum.”
To attract an offence under Section 15C, petitioners should have
consumed liquor in any public place unless consumption of liquor
in such public place is permitted under a licence granted by the
Commissioner. In view of explanation one, public place means
any street, Court, Police Station or other public office or any club
or any place of public amusement or resort or on board any
passenger boat or vessel or any public passenger vehicle, or a
Crl.M.C No.1670 OF 2006 3
dining or refreshment room in a restaurant, hotel, rest-house,
travellers bungalow or tourists’ bungalow where different
individuals or groups of persons consume food, would be a public
place. Hence as is clear from the first explanation such public
place shall not include any private residential room.
6. The specific case is that petitioners were found
consuming liquor in Room No.14 of a lodging house. That room is
admittedly a private residential room. The liquor was not
consumed in the dining or refreshment room in that lodge. Hence
the consumption was not from a public place. If that be so,
Section 15C is not attracted in the case at all. Consumption of
liquor in a private residential room, will not be an offence under
Section 15C in view of Explanation I of Section 15C. Therefore
continuation of the proceedings is only an abuse of process of the
court.
Petition is allowed. S.T.No.3382 of 2004 on the file of the
Judicial Fist Class Magistrat Court, Chavakkad is quashed.
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE
mns