High Court Kerala High Court

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs Assistant Commissionr Special … on 5 April, 2010

Kerala High Court
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs Assistant Commissionr Special … on 5 April, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 9206 of 2010(A)


1. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.,KERALA CIRCLE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONR SPECIAL CIRCLE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. TEAM-1 (FAST TRACK ASSESSMENT),

3. THE DY.COMMISSIONR, COMMERCIAL TAXES,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :05/04/2010

 O R D E R
                    P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
                   ---------------------------
                       W.P(C) No.9206 of 2010-A
                  ----------------------------
                Dated this the 5th day of April, 2010.

                           J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is challenging Exts.P9 and P10 assessment

orders passed under Section 17D of the KGST Act. Many a ground

has been raised in respect of the course and procedure pursued by

the second respondent/Fast Track Team.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

finalization of the proceedings is quite contrary to the statutory

requirements and also the law declared by this Court as per the

decision in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Assistant

Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Ernakulam & others 2009(4)

KHC 819

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances and also the

position reflected from the materials on record, this Court finds

considerable force in the submissions made from the part of the

petitioner. Exts.P9 and P10 do not stand the test of law.

5. In the above facts and circumstances, Ext.P9 and P10 are

W.P(C) No.9206 of 2010-A 2

set aside and the second respondent/competent authority is

directed to re-consider the matter and finalise the assessment in

accordance with law, and in the light of the dictum laid down in the

decision cited supra, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within

two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
JUDGE

//True Copy//

P.A to Judge

ab

W.P(C) No.9206 of 2010-A 3