Gujarat High Court High Court

Bhavnagar vs Jignesh on 8 February, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Bhavnagar vs Jignesh on 8 February, 2011
Author: S.R.Brahmbhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/485/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 485 of 2011
 

 
 
=================================================


 

BHAVNAGAR
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - Petitioner
 

Versus
 

JIGNESH
PRATAPRAI DAVE - Respondent
 

=================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
HS MUNSHAW for Petitioner: 
MR RAJESH P MANKAD for
Respondent: 
================================================= 

 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 08/02/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Affidavit
in reply filed is taken on record. Heard learned advocates for the
parties. Looking to the submission made on behalf of the petitioner,
especially on the aspect of belated raising of dispute, the matter
deserves consideration. Hence RULE. Rule is waived by Shri. Mankad,
learned advocate for the respondent. By way of interim relief the
award impugned shall remain stayed on condition of complying with
Section 17-B of I.D. Act.

At
this stage Shri Mankad submits that in fact the petitioner
Corporation has offered employment by accepting the award without
challenging it and in one matter where the challenge is not made and
instead they have chosen to offer reinstatement to the workman
without prejudice to their right in pursuance to the direction of
this Court to avoid section 17-B wages. In this case also same
direction be issued.

In
view of this request, it is open to the Corporation to offer
employment/reinstatement to the workman on a condition that the
workman shall be paid the current wages which would save the
Corporation from idle wages under section 17-B of I.D. Act. However,
if that option is not exercised, then wages under section 17-B of
I.D. Act be paid to the workman from the date of filing of the
petition.

[
S.R. BRAHMBHATT, J ]

/vgn

   

Top