Bhavnagar vs Unknown on 1 October, 2010

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CRA/1004/2001	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
REVISION APPLICATION No. 1004 of 2001
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
 
 
=========================================================

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To be
			referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================================

 

BHAVNAGAR
UNIVERSITY & 3 - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

ABDULRASHID
ABDULGAFUR SHAIKH & 3 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
JR NANAVATI for
Applicant(s) : 1 - 4. 
RULE SERVED for Opponent(s) : 1, 
NOTICE
SERVED for Opponent(s) : 2, 
[R SHAKTISINH GOHIL] for Opponent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 01/10/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

It
appears that the present petition arises against the interim order
passed by the trial Court. The subject matter of the petition was
pertaining to the election in the University. The interim relief
was granted in the present proceedings and thereafter pending the
petition, the statutory term of the disputed body is also over.

Under
these circumstances, no useful purpose would be served in examining
the questions for academic purpose.

Hence,
the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Rule discharged. I.R., if any, shall stand vacated.

(Jayant
Patel, J.)

vinod

Top