IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.56251 of 2007
BHUSHAN PASWAN & ORS
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
---------
5. 15.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in
connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No.320 of 2006 for the
offences registered under section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the
petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case without any
justification. The so-called deceased lady had herself left her in-laws’
place for which a complaint case was filed by petitioner no.2 vide
Complaint Case No.1384 of 2004, as contained in Annexure 2. It is
further submitted that the informant, the brother of the deceased,
realising that even the petitioners have no role filed a compromise
petition before the court of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur stating therein that
the matter has been settled between the parties, vide Annexure 3 to
this petition.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for
grant of bail, however, he is not in a position to refute the submissions
made on behalf of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on
perusal of the allegations made in the F.I.R. and the other materials
brought on record, it is directed that petitioner no.1 Bhushan Paswan,
2
petitioner no.2 Ram Lakhan Paswan and petitioner no.3 Buchiya
Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with
Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S.Case No.320 of 2006 within a period of four
weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of
Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in
connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in
sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)