High Court Kerala High Court

C.H.Shivarama vs C.H.Sautha Nairk on 24 August, 2009

Kerala High Court
C.H.Shivarama vs C.H.Sautha Nairk on 24 August, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RFA.No. 398 of 2009()


1. C.H.SHIVARAMA, IS THE S/O.PARAMESHWARA
                      ...  Petitioner
2. C.H.SULOCHANA, IS THE D/O.PARAMESHSWARA,
3. C.H.VISHALA,IS W/O. SUNDARA, RESIDING
4. C.H.PUTTAPPAYYA  IS S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR,
5. C.H.YAJNADEVA, IS THE S/O. OF KRISHNA
6. PANDARISHA
7. SHRIDHARA
8. UMA
9. HARINI ARE THE CHILDREN OF BALAKRISHNA,
10. NALINI IS DAUGHTER OF GOPALAKRISHNA,
11. VASANTHI
12. JANARDHANA IS SYNDICATE BANK  PO.
13. BABY  IS D/O.GOPALAKRISHNA, STATE BANK O
14. VINODA
15. THILAKARAJ
16. KRISHNA KUMAR
17. GEETHA
18. GIRISHA
19. SANTHOSH
20. MAHESH
21. RAJESH
22. POORNIMA
23. B.M/JAGADISHA.
24. B.M.GANGADHARA
25. PUSHPAVATHI
26. SARASWATHI
27. SHRIMATHI
28. MANOHARA
29. BABU
30. UMESHA
31. KAMALAKSHA
32. CHANDRAKALA

                        Vs



1. C.H.SAUTHA NAIRK
                       ...       Respondent

2. C.H.PADAMANABHA

3. SASHIKALA.

4. PREMA

5. C.H.HARISHCHANDRA

6. UMANATHA

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.G.GOURI SANKAR RAI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :24/08/2009

 O R D E R
                         V. RAMKUMAR , J.
           -------------------------------------------------------------
                         R.F.A. No. 398 of 2009
            ------------------------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 24th day of August, 2009.

                               JUDGMENT

This appeal is against the final decree dated

14.01.2009 passed by the Sub Court, Kasaragod in O.S No.

27 of 1984 which was a suit for partition.

2. Notice to respondents 1, 2 and 10 herein returned

unserved stating that they have expired. Subsequent

investigation has revealed that the 1st respondent herein

who was the 1st defendant, died on 23.05.1996 and the 2nd

respondent herein who was the 2nd defendant, died on

21.07.2001 and the 10th respondent herein who was the 13th

defendant died on 23.12.2003. This means that all the three

aforesaid respondents died when the matter was pending

before the court below and the final decree passed by that

court on 14.01.2009 is against the aforesaid dead persons.

So, the decree is a nullity so far as it relates to respondents

1, 2 and 10 herein. The proper procedure in such

R.F.A. No. 398/2009 : 2 :

circumstances is to set aside the judgment and decree

passed by that court and send the matter to that Court for

appropriate correction of the cause title. (vide Assyamma

v. Aisabi – 1976 KLT 101). Accordingly, the final decree

and judgment dated 14.01.2009 passed by the Sub Court,

Kasaragod is set aside and the matter is remitted to that

court for disposal afresh after giving the final decree

applicants an opportunity to file petitions for impleading the

legal representatives of defendants 1, 2 and 13 and other

ancillary petitions.

This appeal is disposed of as above.

Dated this the 24th day of August, 2009.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

rv

R.F.A. No. 398/2009 : 3 :