High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Chandan Ravidas vs State Of Bihar on 18 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Chandan Ravidas vs State Of Bihar on 18 August, 2010
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            Cr. Misc. No.23705 of 2010
                   CHANDAN RAVIDAS son of late Bishun Deo Das
                                      Versus
                                STATE OF BIHAR
                                     -----------

2/ 18.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the accused persons are the

uncle and nephew between themselves and it does not appear

probable that they would commit the offence like rape together as

also that the witnesses have stated that the petitioner was implicated

on account of land dispute which has been admitted even by the

prosecutrix.

In view of the such, let the petitioner, above named, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in

connection with Kahalgaon P.S. case no.03 of 2010, subject to the

conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he

is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish

information to the court about any change in the address of the

petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner

is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be

released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that

they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in
-2-

any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case

and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That

the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police

papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and

if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse,

(v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

In case there is any complaint against the petitioner of

tampering with the evidence, an enquiry shall immediately be done

in the matter to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail.

JA/-                                            (Anjana Prakash, J.)